1985
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.54.510
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Single-Particle Momentum Distribution at High Energies and Concept of Partition Temperature

Abstract: A concept of partition temperature is introduced in high-energy collisions. It is a natural mathematical consequence of the Darwin-Fowler method, and neither requires nor implies thermal equilibrium. A collision at a given incoming energy is described as an incoherent superposition of collisions with different partition temperatures. Angular distributions are then presented for Vs = 540 GeV collisions.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
35
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Notice that in our fits we have not explicitly accounted for the fact that each event has its own multiplicity, N , but we have used only its mean value, N , as given by experiment where N = N P (N ) with P (N ) being the multiplicity distribution 6 . On the other hand, the parameter T in this case is not so much a temperature, but only a kind of "partition temperature", understood as mean energy per produced particle, i.e., T ∼ W/ N (where W = K √ s, where √ s is the total energy of collision) [44]. Therefore in this case one can just as well speak about the fluctuations of N .…”
Section: Longitudinal Phase Spacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notice that in our fits we have not explicitly accounted for the fact that each event has its own multiplicity, N , but we have used only its mean value, N , as given by experiment where N = N P (N ) with P (N ) being the multiplicity distribution 6 . On the other hand, the parameter T in this case is not so much a temperature, but only a kind of "partition temperature", understood as mean energy per produced particle, i.e., T ∼ W/ N (where W = K √ s, where √ s is the total energy of collision) [44]. Therefore in this case one can just as well speak about the fluctuations of N .…”
Section: Longitudinal Phase Spacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This drastic difference in the exponents of the power law (19), between e>e\ and pp, is due to the difference in their structure; unlike the proton, the electron is essentially pointlike. This property, as pointed out by Yang et al [1], is due to the difference in the behaviour of the impact parameter b of these two processes. In the case of e>e\, the angular momentum is limited to 0 or 1, so that the fluctuation of b is rather small.…”
Section: Energy Dependencementioning
confidence: 85%
“…The hadrons in final state of Z(91) decays from the e>e\ collisions are of great interest to test the prediction of partition temperature model formulated by Chou et al [1], namely only one single temperature for e>#e\P hhM 2 and the multiplicity distribution is of Poisson-type.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore a black-body spectrum for emitted particles is not synonymous to Hawking radiation. In hadronic collisions at high energies the emitted particles follow thermal spectra, without even implying thermal equilibrium [10]. The relevant calculations [8], [9], presuppose also the validity of the parton model.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%