2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2013.10.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Single phase boundary actuation of a ferromagnetic shape memory foil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on theoretical considerations, the critical magnetic field for MIR is expected to decrease for decreasing foil thickness [10]. However, in real foil specimens, the critical magnetic field and maximum magnetostrain are affected by material inhomogeneity and surface defects depending on the technology of foil fabrication as well as by the constraints of fixation and tensile loading [34,45]. The influence of defects on the mobility of twin boundaries can be reduced by training of the MSMA material.…”
Section: Msm Linear Actuatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Based on theoretical considerations, the critical magnetic field for MIR is expected to decrease for decreasing foil thickness [10]. However, in real foil specimens, the critical magnetic field and maximum magnetostrain are affected by material inhomogeneity and surface defects depending on the technology of foil fabrication as well as by the constraints of fixation and tensile loading [34,45]. The influence of defects on the mobility of twin boundaries can be reduced by training of the MSMA material.…”
Section: Msm Linear Actuatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, single phase boundary actuation results in the formation of a single variant martensite state similar to the case of MSM actuation. As illustrated in the inset of Figure 8a, the maximum strain response is given by the difference of the short c-axis of tetragonal martensite and the axis of cubic austenite to be 4.1% [34]. Similarly, the magnetic field may be applied in a perpendicular direction to the thermal field gradient resulting in a smaller strain change of −1.9% that is given by the difference of the long a-axis of tetragonal martensite and the axis of cubic austenite [34].…”
Section: Operation Principlementioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations