1989
DOI: 10.1007/bf00612996
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Single photon responses in locust photoreceptors: the effects of stimulus location on amplitude and time course

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1990
1990
1994
1994

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Limulus photoreceptors the average delay of single photon responses ("bumps") is twice their average duration, which has been shown to be incompatible with any cascade model in which there is gain at or before the first rate-limiting step (Schnakenberg and Keiper, 1986). However, the ratio between these two parameters is quite different for bumps from locust photoreceptors, for which the average delay is about equal to the average halfduration (Howard, 1983;Pece and French, 1989). The phototransduction process is much faster in insects than it is in Limulus, so that even if the biochemical components are the same, the detailed kinetic parameters are certainly quite different.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Limulus photoreceptors the average delay of single photon responses ("bumps") is twice their average duration, which has been shown to be incompatible with any cascade model in which there is gain at or before the first rate-limiting step (Schnakenberg and Keiper, 1986). However, the ratio between these two parameters is quite different for bumps from locust photoreceptors, for which the average delay is about equal to the average halfduration (Howard, 1983;Pece and French, 1989). The phototransduction process is much faster in insects than it is in Limulus, so that even if the biochemical components are the same, the detailed kinetic parameters are certainly quite different.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 and 3 provide direct evidence for the fast spread of interaction between two flashes. Given the long electrotonic length constant of a locust photoreceptor (about 400 ~tm, according to Payne 1982, andFrench 1989), light-induced depolarization is almost uniform (within 5% between the two sites that we stimulated -Pece and French 1989) and therefore voltage-activated conductances are activated uniformly within the cell. Even if any kind of shunting conductance were to be activated locally, the long length constant would again ensure that it would provide an effective shunt for light responses occurring anywhere within the photoreceptor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 and 3 is that the stimuli were not localized because light scattering made the effective stimuli uniform in intensity over the length of the photoreceptor. Several pieces of evidence presented in a previous study (Pece and French 1989) indicate that the stimulus is localized in this preparation. However, since light scattering could seriously compromise the validity of the above experiment, we tried to obtain more evidence of stimulus localization.…”
Section: Localized Adaptationmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations