2021
DOI: 10.1364/ol.433423
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Single-photon vibrometry

Abstract: We propose and demonstrate a single-photon sensitive technique for optical vibrometry. It uses high speed photon counting to sample the modulated backscattering from a vibrating target. Designed for remote vibration sensing with ultralow photon flux, we show that this technique can detect small displacements down to 110 nm and resolve vibration frequencies from DC up to several kilohertz, with less than 0.01 detected photons per pulse. This single-photon sensitive optical vibrometry may find important applicat… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This result is consistent with Ref. 10 . In both cases, the PNR plots clearly resemble the concentration but not the surface reflectivity, which confirms the results in Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This result is consistent with Ref. 10 . In both cases, the PNR plots clearly resemble the concentration but not the surface reflectivity, which confirms the results in Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 94%
“…Similar to OCE, SPV does not use a complex mathematical model to calculate Young’s modulus. 10 Instead, it directly measures the target’s mechanical response to applied external forces to obtain its elasticity and other physical properties. The second is QPMS, which maximally rejects the background noises from ambient light or multiscattering 11 so that the ultra-weak, single-photon level signals can be detected reliably despite much stronger noises.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This result is consistent with Ref. [24]. In both cases, the PNR plots clearly resemble the concentration but not the surface reflectivity, which confirms the results in Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The first is the noise rejection. In our expriment, QPMS rejects over 99.9% of noise 44 , so that the actual detected noise by the Si-SPD is only on the dark count level, much weaker than the signal, leading to the high accuracy. The second reason is with the much lower noise equivalence of dark counts (NEDC), defined as the detector dark count divided by the total detection efficiency.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 87%