2007
DOI: 10.1007/bf03266608
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Single Sensor Differential Thermal Analysis of Phase Transformations and Structural Changes During Welding and Postweld Heat Treatment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As an efficient experimental check of nucleation behavior, transformation onset temperatures were measured in rapidly cooled arc melted samples of ME3 and Alloy10 using a Single Sensor Differential Thermal Analysis (SSDTA) technique developed at Ohio State University [15]. From nucleation theory, the most important material parameters affecting the nucleation rate are driving force (which is determined by the bulk thermodynamics), surface energy and elastic coherency energy.…”
Section: Nucleation Onset Temperatures and Ssdtamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an efficient experimental check of nucleation behavior, transformation onset temperatures were measured in rapidly cooled arc melted samples of ME3 and Alloy10 using a Single Sensor Differential Thermal Analysis (SSDTA) technique developed at Ohio State University [15]. From nucleation theory, the most important material parameters affecting the nucleation rate are driving force (which is determined by the bulk thermodynamics), surface energy and elastic coherency energy.…”
Section: Nucleation Onset Temperatures and Ssdtamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Phase transformation temperatures during cooling after welding. To observe the transformation temperatures for the martensite and bainite transformation at both steels, a Single Sensor Differential Thermal Analysis [13] was realized. In Table 4 the transformation temperatures for all dummy seams are listed, based on the cooling curves registered by the type-K thermo couples and the two colour pyrometer.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…29,30 In addition, elastic coherency (misfit) energy, G el , can be evaluated for a further energy penalty to the precipitation when particles are coherent. In the work by Olson et al 31 the method of estimating coherent interfacial energy (G coh ) and elastic misfit energy was demonstrated using single sensor differential thermal analysis 32 combined with APT.…”
Section: Materials By Design: Design Enginementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding the high sensitivity of interfacial energy in precipitation simulation, PrecipiCalc simulations were carried out by adjusting interfacial energy to match the critical nucleation undercooling accurately determined by the single sensor differential thermal analysis technique, which measures a precise thermal history of a rapidlyquenched 3-mm diameter pins. 31,32 Afterwards, the PrecipiCalc simulated microstructural attributes were further compared with the APT characterisation to evaluate uncertainty limits. It should be noted that, having demonstrated the importance of the AIM technique, a suite of advanced 3D tomographic multiscale characterisation tools were further developed under the support of ONR and DARPA.…”
Section: Aim: Accelerating Technology Transitionmentioning
confidence: 99%