Single-Session Alcohol Interventions for Heavy Drinking College Students: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Abstract

ABSTRACT. Objective: The purpose of this study was to conduct a meta-analysis summarizing the effectiveness of brief, single-session interventions to reduce alcohol use among heavy drinking college students. Method: A comprehensive literature search identified 73 studies comparing the effects of single-session brief alcohol intervention with treatment-as-usual or no-treatment control conditions on alcohol use among heavy drinking college students. Random-effects meta-analyses with robust variance estimates were used to synthesize 662 effect sizes, estimating the average overall effect of the interventions and the variability in effects across a range of moderators. Results: An overall mean effect size of g\ = 0.18, 95% CI [0.12, 0.24] indicated that, on average, single-session brief alcohol interventions significantly reduced alcohol use among heavy drinking college students relative to comparison conditions. There was minimal variability in effects associated with study method and quality, general study characteristics, participant demographics, or outcome measure type. However, studies using motivational enhancement therapy/motivational interviewing (MET/MI) modalities reported larger effects than those using psychoeducational therapy (PET) interventions. Further investigation revealed that studies using MET/ MI and feedback-only interventions, but not those using cognitive-behavioral therapy or PET modalities, reported average effect sizes that differed significantly from zero. There was also evidence that long-term effects were weaker than short-term effects. Conclusions: Single-session brief alcohol interventions show modest effects for reducing alcohol consumption among heavy drinking college students and may be particularly effective when they incorporate MET/MI principles. More research is needed to directly compare intervention modalities, to develop more potent interventions, and to explore the persistence of long-term effects. (J. Stud. Alcohol Drugs, 76, 530-543, 2015)

Current forms of inhibitory training produce no greater reduction in drinking than simple assessment: A preliminary study

“…Secondly, we also consider the effectiveness of inhibitory training relative to an established method of reducing consumption, namely a Brief Alcohol Intervention (BAI), which consists of questions about and motivational feedback concerning alcohol consumption. Meta-analytic reviews confirm BAIs are effective at reducing consumption (e.g., Bertholet et al, 2005); they are also effective within the specific target population of this study (i.e., university students; Kypri et al, 2009;Samson and Tanner-Smith, 2015). BAIs can easily reach large samples via the internet; although the inhibitory tasks above could theoretically be delivered online (Jones et al, 2014), in the studies cited above, participants have completed the sessions in the laboratory.…”

Peer Network Counseling as Brief Treatment for Urban Adolescent Heavy Cannabis Users

“…Motivational interviewing has been found to be effective among college students who are heavy users of cannabis (McCambridge & Strang, 2004) and heavy drinking college students (Samson & Tanner-Smith, 2015). Adolescents experiencing problematic alcohol use had significantly better outcomes after brief motivational interviewing than their peers who did not evidence alcohol problems (Spirito et al, 2004).…”

Symptomatic distress and effectiveness of psychological treatments delivered at a nationwide student counseling service

“…Meta-analyses show that evidence-based psychological interventions for depression (Cuijpers et al, 2015), and general stress problems (Regehr, Glancy, & Pitts, 2013) are efficacious also for college and university students. Other meta-analyses indicate that students benefit from interventions directed at test anxiety (Ergene, 2003), and alcohol abuse (Carey, Scott-Sheldon, Garey, Elliott, & Carey, 2016;Samson & Tanner-Smith, 2015), and from preventions programs for students at risk of developing mental health problems (Conley, Shapiro, Kirsch, & Durlak, 2017). Furthermore, numerous studies have used the student counseling setting to investigate a broad range of clinical issues, e.g., feedback, therapist effects, dose-effect relationships, the effect of specific psychotherapy approaches, and psychometric measures (see, for examples, Minami et al (2009)).…”