1965
DOI: 10.3758/bf03343340
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Single session conditioning of the nictitating membrane in the rabbit: Effect of intertriai interval

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

1972
1972
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both have affected acquisition rates in nictitating membrane͞eyeblink conditioning (34)(35)(36). Therefore, to rule out the possibility of these two factors contributing to any observed learning rate differences between the experimental groups, two groups of yoked control animals were run (n ϭ 5 per group).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both have affected acquisition rates in nictitating membrane͞eyeblink conditioning (34)(35)(36). Therefore, to rule out the possibility of these two factors contributing to any observed learning rate differences between the experimental groups, two groups of yoked control animals were run (n ϭ 5 per group).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1969) and requires no further elaboration. (2) Prescinding for the moment from the decrement in conditioning for the 750-msec/60•sec group, it is clear that within each lSI value, performance increased with increasing ITT, although asymptotic levels were reached more rapidly with constant ITIs than had been previously reported with variable ITIs (e.g., Brelsford & Theios, 1965;Frey & Misfeldt, 1967).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Furthermore, the rabbit conditioning studies which have reported ITi effects over larger ranges have tended to involve single-session conditioning (e.g., Brelsford & Theios, 1965;Frey & Misfeldt. 1967, Experiment 2).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These results were further interpreted in the context of yoked control groups, in which the inter-trial intervals (ITIs) were matched to T+ or T− subjects but theta was not specifically controlled. This was important because the number of trials per session and the inter-trial interval are known to affect learning rate [14,64,94,96,116]. These groups also allowed for some inferences to be made regarding the direction of the behavioral effect, namely that T− animals performed significantly worse than animals in which theta was unregulated, while T+ animals were not significantly different than either group of yoked controls.…”
Section: Theta-triggering Interface Development and Initial Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%