2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.cad.2006.06.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Single-set and class-of-sets semantics for geometric models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Now the winding number can be computed more precisely, but this precision should not be trusted if P is within (or close to) the bounding rectangle of one of the added segments. For more on these issues, see [9].…”
Section: Two Dimensionsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Now the winding number can be computed more precisely, but this precision should not be trusted if P is within (or close to) the bounding rectangle of one of the added segments. For more on these issues, see [9].…”
Section: Two Dimensionsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…It should be noted that Poincaré found a more efficient way to compute the winding number of a point with respect to a polygon that does not involve computing any of the angles between segments; see [9] for details. However, it is not clear how to make his two-dimensional algorithm work in three dimensions, so I will not take advantage of it here.…”
Section: Two Dimensionsmentioning
confidence: 99%