2016
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.94.054013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Single spin asymmetry in forwardpAcollisions

Abstract: We compute the transverse single spin asymmetry in light hadron production p ↑ p → hX and p ↑ A → hX including the gluon saturation effect in the unpolarized nucleon/nucleus. In the forward (large-xF ) region, the dominant contribution comes from the so-called derivative term associated with the soft gluonic pole. This leads to the cancellation of nuclear effects in AN which can be tested at RHIC. We also show that the soft fermionic pole disappears in the saturation environment.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
35
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
1
35
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The dynamics of gluons in the small-x regime, where the gluon density is predicted to increase drastically, can be described by the color-glass condensate (CGC) formalism [39] at the saturation scale Q s , where Q 2 sA ∝ A 1/3 for the target nucleus [40,41]. In recent years, substantial attention has been given to an interplay between small-x physics and spin physics by studying TSSAs in transversely-polarized proton and ion collisions (p ↑ +A) and gluon saturation effects in a nucleus are taken into account for various calculations of TSSAs in p ↑ +A collisions [40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51]. An A-dependence of TSSAs can arise from the A-dependence of Q s when the probe is at or below Q s , while TSSAs are expected to be A-independent at higher scales [42,43,[49][50][51].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dynamics of gluons in the small-x regime, where the gluon density is predicted to increase drastically, can be described by the color-glass condensate (CGC) formalism [39] at the saturation scale Q s , where Q 2 sA ∝ A 1/3 for the target nucleus [40,41]. In recent years, substantial attention has been given to an interplay between small-x physics and spin physics by studying TSSAs in transversely-polarized proton and ion collisions (p ↑ +A) and gluon saturation effects in a nucleus are taken into account for various calculations of TSSAs in p ↑ +A collisions [40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51]. An A-dependence of TSSAs can arise from the A-dependence of Q s when the probe is at or below Q s , while TSSAs are expected to be A-independent at higher scales [42,43,[49][50][51].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We can also derive another relation from (44). Following a similar step from (19) to (20), we obtain the following relation.…”
Section: Relations Between D-and F -Type Ffs and Qcd Equation Of Motionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[36], and the Wilson line structure in the rest two terms are also organized in different ways as compared to that in Ref. [36]. Before computing the twist-3 piece, as a consistency check, let us first have a look at the twist-2 part of the derived amplitude by setting p ⊥ = 0.…”
Section: The Computation Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 which describes the interaction between the collinear gluon from the projectile and color source inside the target is missing in Ref. [36], and the Wilson line structure in the rest two terms are also organized in different ways as compared to that in Ref. [36].…”
Section: The Computation Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation