2010
DOI: 10.1021/pr900844q
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Single-Step Procedure for the Isolation of Proteins at Near-Native Conditions from Mammalian Tissue for Proteomic Analysis on Antibody Microarrays

Abstract: The process of extracting comprehensive proteome representations is a crucial step for many proteomic studies. While antibody microarrays are an evolving and promising methodology in proteomics, the issue of protein extraction from tissues for this kind of analysis has never been addressed. Here, we describe a single-step extraction buffer for the isolation of proteins from mammalian tissues under native conditions in an effective and reproducible manner. Protein was extracted from cell lines BxPC-3 and SU.86.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Eventually, this novel approach was performed with low concentration of chemical detergents, making the graft more suitable to harbor cells, which could proliferate and colonize it. Combining multiple detergents enhances ECM deprivation [45] but also permits a more extensive detergent removal after decellularization because lower detergent doses are employed [46][47][48]. The definition of the The first version of protocol achieved slightly poorer results compared to the Hudson method, but the tissue manual processing was reduced to less than 4 hours.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eventually, this novel approach was performed with low concentration of chemical detergents, making the graft more suitable to harbor cells, which could proliferate and colonize it. Combining multiple detergents enhances ECM deprivation [45] but also permits a more extensive detergent removal after decellularization because lower detergent doses are employed [46][47][48]. The definition of the The first version of protocol achieved slightly poorer results compared to the Hudson method, but the tissue manual processing was reduced to less than 4 hours.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proteins were extracted following the procedure described by Alhamdani et al [20]. Briefly, the frozen tissue ( ca .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cellular proteins were extracted using the optimized extraction process described in detail before [25]. In brief, at 90% confluence, cells were washed three times with ice cold phosphate buffered saline (PBS) and layered with the extraction buffer (Hepes-Mix: 20 mM Hepes buffer, pH 7.9, 1 mM MgCl 2 , 5 mM EDTA, 1 mM phenylmethanesulfonyl fluoride, 1% NP-40 substitute, 0.5% sodium cholate, 0.25% n-dodecyl-β-D-maltoside (GenaXXon Bioscience, Ulm, Germany), 0.25% amidosulfobetaine-14, 1 U/μl of Benzonase (Merck Biosciences, Schwalbach, Germany) and Halt Protease and Phosphatase Inhibitor Cocktail (Thermo Scientific, Bonn, Germany)).…”
Section: Protein Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%