2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.mseb.2020.114896
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Single-step synthesis of Fe-TiO2 nanotube arrays with improved light harvesting properties for application as photoactive electrodes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
3
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Co‐TiO 2 nanotube electrode presented current density of 0.12 mA.cm −2 at 0.8 V versus Ag/AgCl. This value is similar to results reported in the literature for electrodes obtained under similar synthesis conditions 33,52 . The samples synthesized by CVD at 700 and 800°C showed current densities of 1.13 mA.cm −2 and 7.84 mA.cm −2 , respectively, which is 9 and 65 times greater than the Co‐TiO 2 sample.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Co‐TiO 2 nanotube electrode presented current density of 0.12 mA.cm −2 at 0.8 V versus Ag/AgCl. This value is similar to results reported in the literature for electrodes obtained under similar synthesis conditions 33,52 . The samples synthesized by CVD at 700 and 800°C showed current densities of 1.13 mA.cm −2 and 7.84 mA.cm −2 , respectively, which is 9 and 65 times greater than the Co‐TiO 2 sample.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…This value is similar to results reported in the literature for electrodes obtained under similar synthesis conditions. 33,52 The samples synthesized by CVD at 700 and 800°C showed current densities of 1.13 mA.cm −2 and 7.84 mA.cm −2 , respectively, which is 9 and 65 times greater than the Co-TiO 2 sample. It is observed that the deposition of CNTs onto the surface of the Co-TiO 2 nanotubes significantly improved the light-harvesting performance of the electrodes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…For Fe-TNT fabricated by simultaneous anodization and deposition, the Fe-TNT exhibited a bandgap of 2.90 to 3.05 with no reflection pertaining to iron species from the XRD analysis. The crystal structure and morphological analysis of this study are in good agreement with our finding [28]. This reduction of the bandgap indicated that Fe-TNT1 and Fe-TNT3 should demonstrate higher photo response under halogen lamp illumination.…”
Section: Uv-vis Diffuse Reflectance Analysissupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Apparently, all Fe-TNT samples demonstrated higher photocurrent in comparison with TNT except for Fe-TNT4. Fe-TNT2 179 Lim Ying Chin, Najaa Mustaffa, Asmaa Kadim Ayal, Structural Characterization and Visible Light-Induced Devagi Kanakaraju and Lim Ying Pei Photoelectrochemical Performance of Fe-Sensitized TiO2 Nanotube Arrays Prepared via Electrodeposition showed the highest photocurrent and photoconversion efficiency (Table 3) among all the synthesized samples, suggesting that more photoinduced charges were generated and the recombination between the electrons and holes was prevented [28]. Fe 3+ trapped the photogenerated electrons and holes that reduced the recombination rate of the photogenerated charge carriers.…”
Section: Photoelectrochemical Test Of Fe-tntsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The negative effects caused by Fe dopant were also found by Zhu et al [45] and Sood et al [47]. At suitable concentrations, the addition of Fe 3+ dopant can improve the performance of the photocatalyst by increasing the radical/ROS species formed, which had been reported by other authors [48][49][50]. The beneficial effects of Fe 3+ as a dopant are expressed in Equations 23 to 26.…”
Section: Microplastic Degradationsupporting
confidence: 56%