2017
DOI: 10.3414/me17-03-0001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Single Subject (N-of-1) Research Design, Data Processing, and Personal Science

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Personal science as a concept was derived from work of noted physical chemist and philosopher of science Michael Polanyi, whose work emphasized the tacit and subjective dimensions of mainstream scientific practice (Polanyi, 1958). Although in its origin the term personal science has wide scope, it has more recently been used to refer to the kinds of self-research described here (Roberts, 2014;de Groot et al, 2017;Heyen, 2017). In a well-informed and sensitive analysis that draws extensively on research conducted in the Quantified Self community, the sociologist Nils Heyen proposed "personal science" as the specific term labeling the practice of exploring one's own personal questions using empirical methods .…”
Section: Citizen Science and Personal Sciencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Personal science as a concept was derived from work of noted physical chemist and philosopher of science Michael Polanyi, whose work emphasized the tacit and subjective dimensions of mainstream scientific practice (Polanyi, 1958). Although in its origin the term personal science has wide scope, it has more recently been used to refer to the kinds of self-research described here (Roberts, 2014;de Groot et al, 2017;Heyen, 2017). In a well-informed and sensitive analysis that draws extensively on research conducted in the Quantified Self community, the sociologist Nils Heyen proposed "personal science" as the specific term labeling the practice of exploring one's own personal questions using empirical methods .…”
Section: Citizen Science and Personal Sciencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A variety of authors from diverse disciplines have spoken about the value of N-of-1 research (Guyatt et al, 1986;Lillie et al, 2011;Barnett et al, 2012;Parker and Vannest, 2012;Dallery et al, 2013;Duan et al, 2013;Kravitz and Duan, 2014;Schork, 2015;Strathmann, 2015;Vohra et al, 2015;De Groot and Martin-Sanchez, 2017;Lobo et al, 2017;Mirza et al, 2017). The U.S. Department of Health's Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality has even published its own user guide to N-of-1 trials (AHRQ, 2014), and CONSORT has issued reporting guidelines (Vohra et al, 2015).…”
Section: Small Data and N-of-1 Individual Sciencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…. self-scientists (Parker and Vannest, 2012;Strathmann, 2015;Karkar et al, 2016;De Groot and Martin-Sanchez, 2017;Wicks, 2018).…”
Section: The Self-scientistmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proliferation of GPS and GIS technologies present particular opportunities to those interested in single-subject or N-of-1 investigations (De Groot et al, 2017). As identified by a recent systematic review of GPS measures in built environment-physical activity studies by Yi and colleagues, individual-level, geolocated datasets might also help address selection bias in place-based research by helping account for potentially influential individual characteristics, and enabling improved experimental or quasiexperimental research designs (Yi et al, 2019).…”
Section: Opportunities For Place-based N-of-1mentioning
confidence: 99%