2000
DOI: 10.1016/s1388-2457(00)00463-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Single trial analysis of event related potentials: non-linear de-noising with wavelets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further, the nonstationarity of the EEG process usually does not allow constructing a global dynamical model for the whole observable [Skinner and Molnar, 2000]. Thus, regardless of how powerful or statistically significant the different estimations of averaged EEG phenomena may be, there might be difficulties in the meaningful interpretation of these if they are not matched to their piecewise stationary structure [Effern et al, 2000;Fingelkurts et al, 2002;Laskaris and Ioannides, 2001]. That is why the algorithms based on a nonstationary model of the EEG signal are of particular importance.…”
Section: Appendix a Methodological Aspects Of The Adaptive Level Eeg mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, the nonstationarity of the EEG process usually does not allow constructing a global dynamical model for the whole observable [Skinner and Molnar, 2000]. Thus, regardless of how powerful or statistically significant the different estimations of averaged EEG phenomena may be, there might be difficulties in the meaningful interpretation of these if they are not matched to their piecewise stationary structure [Effern et al, 2000;Fingelkurts et al, 2002;Laskaris and Ioannides, 2001]. That is why the algorithms based on a nonstationary model of the EEG signal are of particular importance.…”
Section: Appendix a Methodological Aspects Of The Adaptive Level Eeg mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such trial-to-trial variability has been reported both for EEG [Effern et al, 2000;Jung et al, 2001] and fMRI [Duann et al, 2002;Kruggel and von Cramon, 1999]. This variability is typically not taken into account in classical analysis procedures that rely on averaging, as done for ERPs, or on fitting a model with constant amplitude, as performed for fMRI statistical maps.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Laskaris et al, 1997) and noise suppression (e.g. Effern et al, 2000) and post-processing by most of the Pattern Analysis techniques, cited herein, for passing from a qualitative description to the quantitative modeling of the process generating the ST-data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%