2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2008.10.035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Single-trial P300 estimation with a spatiotemporal filtering method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The P300 reflects the averaged summed electrophysiological activity of several brain structures that become active around 300ms after stimulus presentation (Soltani and Knight, 2000). The scalp P300, therefore, reflects a mixture (Makeig et al, 2002; Polich, 2007), which has previously been linked to a variety of phenomena including autonomous reactions, stimulus probability, motivational significance, attention, and task performance (Duncan-Johnson and Donchin, 1977; Isreal et al, 1980; Donchin et al, 1984; Li et al, 2009; Nieuwenhuis et al, 2011). In contrast, the N300H only reflects a highly specific portion of variance of EEG 300 ms after a feedback stimulus: that portion that is shared with variance of beat-to-beat intervals hundreds of ms later.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The P300 reflects the averaged summed electrophysiological activity of several brain structures that become active around 300ms after stimulus presentation (Soltani and Knight, 2000). The scalp P300, therefore, reflects a mixture (Makeig et al, 2002; Polich, 2007), which has previously been linked to a variety of phenomena including autonomous reactions, stimulus probability, motivational significance, attention, and task performance (Duncan-Johnson and Donchin, 1977; Isreal et al, 1980; Donchin et al, 1984; Li et al, 2009; Nieuwenhuis et al, 2011). In contrast, the N300H only reflects a highly specific portion of variance of EEG 300 ms after a feedback stimulus: that portion that is shared with variance of beat-to-beat intervals hundreds of ms later.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead of modeling the entire ERP waveform, different spatial and temporal filtering methods have been proposed by researchers to extract the most representative ERP features, components, or patterns that could best represent the user's intent. These includes methods based on orthogonal linear transformation (Dien et al 2003), blind source separation (Xu et al 2004, Li et al 2009a, Li et al 2009b, wavelet transform (Quian Quiroga andGarcia 2003, Bostanov andKotchoubey 2006) and other advanced techniques (Rivet et al 2009). These advanced feature extractors reduce the dimension of the feature space and capture the most distinctive information in a singletrial ERP for subsequent binary classification.…”
Section: Feature Extraction and Classification Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though P300 latency is an important factor for the P3 Speller, only a few very recent studies have attempted to explicitly calculate or correct for P300 latency. Researchers used Bayesian methods [25] and spatiotemporal filtering methods [26] to estimate properties of single-trial event-related potentials (ERPs), including latency estimates. But, surprisingly only one study has been found in the literature which attempted to correct latency jitter [27], using a maximum-likelihood estimation (MLE) method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%