2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2023.119895
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Single trial variability in neural activity during a working memory task reveals multiple distinct information processing sequences

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, increasing gamma favors the identification of smaller clusters and lowering gamma favors the identification of larger clusters. Further, we expected to find a small number of clusters because in previous work in which we clustered trials in EEG data we found at most three 62,64 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, increasing gamma favors the identification of smaller clusters and lowering gamma favors the identification of larger clusters. Further, we expected to find a small number of clusters because in previous work in which we clustered trials in EEG data we found at most three 62,64 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The representative partition is then obtained by using a Generalized Louvain algorithm to identify clusters within the thresholded nodal association matrix 60 . We have previously utilized this method to identify trial subtypes in brain activity measured with electroencephalography in a motion discrimination 61 task and working memory task 62 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The similarity between trials was calculated using Pearson correlation because this is a commonly used measure to estimate the similarity. 19 The clustering utilized both spatial and temporal activity. The spatial data is represented from all EEG sensors (63 channels) and temporal activity is from stimulus onset to 500 ms post-stimulus sampled every 2 ms for a total of 63 (channels) x 251 (timepoints) = 15813 data points from each trial.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18 However, it is also possible that subsets of trials exhibit brain activity that is not well represented by the average. 19 , 20 Indeed, brain activity measured with EEG is both spatially and temporally variable during a task, with at least some of this variability likely stemming from meaningful variation in internal processing rather than simply noise. 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 Additionally, averaging across all trials might eliminate the ability to observe distinct forms of stimulus-driven activity (i.e., the ERP) that are engaged differentially on individual trials or contexts but that are, nonetheless, relevant for behavioral performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation