2020
DOI: 10.1136/bmjinnov-2019-000381
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Single-unit, wireless device for salivary stimulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The mean baseline salivary flow rate was 0.15 ± 0.05 ml/min, while the mean salivary flow rate post-intervention at three months was 0.35 ± 0.09 ml/min (Table 5 ) [ 19 ]. Even though our study did not have a separate control group, baseline saliva was considered the control group in standardising the outcome.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The mean baseline salivary flow rate was 0.15 ± 0.05 ml/min, while the mean salivary flow rate post-intervention at three months was 0.35 ± 0.09 ml/min (Table 5 ) [ 19 ]. Even though our study did not have a separate control group, baseline saliva was considered the control group in standardising the outcome.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Miniature electrodes were custom designed and developed using bio-safe stainless steel (SS 304). The device was custom designed to generate electrical impulses through the electrodes on the body (conductor) at a set frequency (80 Hz), which is hypothesised to stimulate the efferent nerves to improve the secretomotor drive and salivary output [ 19 , 34 ].
Fig.
…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations