2001
DOI: 10.1007/s005310000139
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Single zircon ages and whole-rock Nd isotopic systematics of early Palaeozoic granitoid gneisses from the Czech and Polish Sudetes (Jizerské hory, Krkonoše Mountains and Orlice-Sněžník Complex)

Abstract: Granitoid orthogneisses make up the predominant rock type in the West Sudetes from JizerskØ hory in the NW to the OrlickØ hory and Sne Ï z Ïník Mountains in the SE. These generally strongly foliated gneisses are calc-alkaline in composition and display trace element characteristics suggesting generation in a volcanic arc setting. Single zircon ages reflecting the time of emplacement of the gneiss protoliths define a relatively narrow Cambro-Ordovician range between 502 and 515 Ma.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
115
2
2

Year Published

2002
2002
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 118 publications
(128 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
9
115
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The term is used here as defined by Fiala et al (1995), except of the Svratka and the Kutná Hora units -below we present evidence indicating that the latter two units evolved as separate entities; (2) the Teplá-Barrandian Zone as the upper-crustal segment including unmetamorphosed to medium-grade Neoproterozoic and Lower Palaeozoic volcanosedimentary sequences (e.g. Chaloupský et al 1995;Zulauf 1997;Drost et al 2004); (3) the Saxothuringian Zone and Western Sudetes as Neoproterozoic to Lower Palaeozoic rock complexes with tectonically implanted slices of Variscan HP and UHP rocks (Kröner et al 2001;Mazur et al 2005). The units nowadays located at the eastern margin of the Bohemian Massif were thrust over pre-Variscan basement, deformed Late Neoproterozoic granitoids and a tectonically imbricated metasedimentary sequence of Devonian age of the Moravo-Silesian Zone (Schulmann and Gayer 2000).…”
Section: Geological Settingmentioning
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The term is used here as defined by Fiala et al (1995), except of the Svratka and the Kutná Hora units -below we present evidence indicating that the latter two units evolved as separate entities; (2) the Teplá-Barrandian Zone as the upper-crustal segment including unmetamorphosed to medium-grade Neoproterozoic and Lower Palaeozoic volcanosedimentary sequences (e.g. Chaloupský et al 1995;Zulauf 1997;Drost et al 2004); (3) the Saxothuringian Zone and Western Sudetes as Neoproterozoic to Lower Palaeozoic rock complexes with tectonically implanted slices of Variscan HP and UHP rocks (Kröner et al 2001;Mazur et al 2005). The units nowadays located at the eastern margin of the Bohemian Massif were thrust over pre-Variscan basement, deformed Late Neoproterozoic granitoids and a tectonically imbricated metasedimentary sequence of Devonian age of the Moravo-Silesian Zone (Schulmann and Gayer 2000).…”
Section: Geological Settingmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Grt-Cpx, Cpx-Grt, garnetite, Cpx skarn, Grt-Hbl, Gru-Cpx processes during Cambrian magmatic event 530-515 Ma ago (U-Pb on zircon) (Kröner et al 2001;Štípská et al 2004;Schulmann et al 2005). The rock-forming minerals of the studied rocks were affected by Variscan deformation and metamorphic recrystallization under ~MP−MT conditions at ~350−330 Ma (Buriánek et al 2009b).…”
Section: Svratka Unitmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Izera gran ites were emplaced by Early Pa leo zoic (Cam brian to Or do vi cian) magmatism. The gran ites, grano diorites and gneisses from the east ern part of the Izera Mas sif have been dated using sev eral dif fer ent meth ods and span a gen eral age range of 550-460 Ma (Borkowska et al, 1980;Jarmołowicz-Szulc, 1984;Korytowski et al, 1993;Kröner et al, 2001).…”
Section: Geological Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Cambro-Ordovician protolith age of the orthogneisses was a subject of several papers (e.g. Kröner et al 2000Kröner et al , 2001 for review), while the controversial protolith ages for eclogites were recently discussed by Bröcker et al (2010).…”
Section: Variscan Deformation and Metamorphismmentioning
confidence: 99%