2019
DOI: 10.1002/ldr.3255
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sinkhole susceptibility mapping: A comparison between Bayes‐based machine learning algorithms

Abstract: Land degradation has been recognized as one of the most adverse environmental impacts during the last century. The occurrence of sinkholes is increasing dramatically in many regions worldwide contributing to land degradation. The rise in the sinkhole frequency is largely due to human‐induced hydrological alterations that favour dissolution and subsidence processes. Mitigating detrimental impacts associated with sinkholes requires understanding different aspects of this phenomenon such as the controlling factor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
39
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
(96 reference statements)
0
39
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Machine learning techniques have recently gained good attention among the environmental modeling research community as they are advantageous in efficiently capturing the complex relationship between the environmental predictors and the response, such as flood [33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41], wildfire [42], sinkhole [43], drought [44], gully erosion [45,46], groundwater [47][48][49] and land/ground subsidence [27], and landslide in this case [3,13,[50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57]. In due course, researches have also attempted to improve the prediction accuracy and the interpretability of the models through applying various decision-trees machine learning algorithms such as chi-square automatic interaction detector; quick, unbiased and efficient statistical tree [58]; J48 decision trees [59]; ID3 decision trees [60]; random forests [61]; classification and regression trees [62]; alternating decision trees [63]; reduced error pruning trees [3]; naïve Bayes [35,53]; naïve Bayes tree [13,64]; kernel logistic regression [37]; logistic model tree [38,…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Machine learning techniques have recently gained good attention among the environmental modeling research community as they are advantageous in efficiently capturing the complex relationship between the environmental predictors and the response, such as flood [33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41], wildfire [42], sinkhole [43], drought [44], gully erosion [45,46], groundwater [47][48][49] and land/ground subsidence [27], and landslide in this case [3,13,[50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57]. In due course, researches have also attempted to improve the prediction accuracy and the interpretability of the models through applying various decision-trees machine learning algorithms such as chi-square automatic interaction detector; quick, unbiased and efficient statistical tree [58]; J48 decision trees [59]; ID3 decision trees [60]; random forests [61]; classification and regression trees [62]; alternating decision trees [63]; reduced error pruning trees [3]; naïve Bayes [35,53]; naïve Bayes tree [13,64]; kernel logistic regression [37]; logistic model tree [38,…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent developments of machine learning (ML) have introduced new optimization algorithms, which could be used for optimizing weights for membership function of the neural fuzzy model. Furthermore, ML techniques have recently gained a good attention among environmental modeling research community as they are advantageous in efficiently capturing the complex relationship between the environmental predictors and the response, such as flood [55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63], earthquake [64,65], wildfire [66], sinkhole [67], droughtiness [68], gully erosion [69,70], groundwater [71][72][73][74] and land/ground subsidence [75], and landslide in this case [54,59,. Nevertheless, investigation of new optimization algorithms and the neural fuzzy has not been carried out.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many researchers have worked with more than one model and compared to find out which one is most accurate [9]. Recently, machine learning (ML) techniques have become popular in spatial prediction of natural hazards studies such as wildfire [45], sinkhole [91], groundwater and flood [1,12,16,17,40,49,50,59,76,77,82,93], droughtiness [80], gully erosion [7,98], earthquake [4], land/ground subsidence [96] and landslide studies [68,70,79,87,67,97]. ML is a subdivision of artificial intelligence (AI) that uses computer techniques to analyze and forecast information by learning from training data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%