Sino‐Nasal Outcome Test–22

Shapira‐Galitz, Yael; Halperin, Doron; Bavnik, Yosef; Warman, Meir

doi:10.1177/0194599816629378

Cited by 28 publications

(10 citation statements)

References 17 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The sample size was relatively small, but comparable with average numbers of other international SNOT-22 validation studies. 6 – 8 , 10 , 11 , 18 , 21 Furthermore, validation of the SNOT-22 in the current study was in a Saudi Arabian population. We did not enroll subjects from other Arab countries.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 73%

Psychometric Arabic Sino-Nasal Outcome Test-22: validation and translation in chronic rhinosinusitis patients

Alanazy

Dousary

Albosaily

et al. 2018

Annals of Saudi Medicine

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BACKGROUNDThe Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT)-22 has multiple items that reflect how nasal disease affects quality of life. Currently, no validated Arabic version of the SNOT-22 is available.OBJECTIVETo develop an Arabic-validated version of SNOT-22.DESIGNProspective.SETTINGTertiary care center.PATIENT AND METHODSThis single-center validation study was conducted between 2015 and 2017 at King Abdul-Aziz University Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. The SNOT-22 English version was translated into Arabic by the forward and backward method. The test and retest reliability, internal consistency, responsiveness to surgical treatment, discriminant validity, sensitivity and specificity all were tested.MAIN OUTCOME MEASURESValidated Arabic version of the SNOT-22.RESULTSOf 265 individuals, 171 were healthy volunteers and 94 were chronic rhinosinusitis patients. The Arabic version showed high internal consistency (Cronbach’s of 0.94), and the ability to differentiate between diseased and healthy volunteers (P<.001). The translated versions demonstrated the ability to detect the change scores significantly in response to intervention (P<.001).CONCLUSIONThis is the first validated Arabic version of SNOT-22. The instrument can be used among the Arabic population.LIMITATIONSNo subjects from other Arab countries.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 73%

Psychometric Arabic Sino-Nasal Outcome Test-22: validation and translation in chronic rhinosinusitis patients

Alanazy

Dousary

Albosaily

et al. 2018

Annals of Saudi Medicine

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…We used the validated Hebrew version of the Sinonasal Outcome Test-22 to study different mask types' impact. This questionnaire addresses various aspects directly related to specific diseases of the nose and sinuses, as well as general health [6]. Previous studies have confirmed that the SNOT-22 is valid and reliable for this purpose.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

How face masks influence the sinonasal quality of life during the COVID-19 pandemic

Primov-Fever

Amir

Roziner

et al. 2021

Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose To study different mask types' impact on a sinonasal quality of life. Methods For this observational cross-sectional study, a web-based survey was distributed via social media forums. We used the validated Hebrew version of the Sinonasal Outcome Test-22 followed by a questionnaire developed specifically for the present study, focusing on the time of the COVID-19 pandemic (Mask Sinonasal Outcome Test), and questions regarding general health issues. The participants' mask-wearing routine was also studied. Results Seventy percent of 351 participants had experienced a change in their breathing during the time of the pandemic. The median total Sinonasal Outcome Test-22 score was 13, and 10% of the participants reported a significantly impaired quality of life. According to multivariate analyses, the only subject-related variables significantly associated with the reduced sinonasal quality of life were female gender, younger age, a background of chronic rhinitis and sinusitis, and the mask-wearing average daily duration. The mask sinonasal outcome test convergent validity was confirmed. ConclusionThe majority of our survey's responders, predominantly female and younger participants, reported reduced sinonasal quality of life in the COVID-19 pandemic period. It can be attributed to mask-wearing, especially for a prolonged time, irrespective of the existing mask type. These findings should encourage medical companies to produce more "airwayminded" personal protection equipment.

show abstract

“…The questionnaire has been validated to evaluate the outcome after endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) in CRS patients and has been used to evaluate the effect of ESS in CF patients 23,24 . Recently, it was translated to Hebrew and validated 25 …”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Pulmonary functions, nasal symptoms, and quality of life in patients with primary ciliary dyskinesia (PCD)

Gut,

Bar‐Yoseph,

Hanna

et al. 2023

Pediatric Pulmonology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundSeveral factors may influence quality of life (QOL) for patients with primary ciliary dyskinesia (PCD). We aimed to evaluate the association between pulmonary functions, nasal symptoms and QOL in PCD patients.MethodsA prospective single center study. Patients performed spirometry, whole body plethysmography, forced oscillation technique (FOT), lung clearance index (LCI), 6‐min walk test (6MWT), and filled two questionnaires: a specific PCD QOL questionnaire (PCD‐QOL) and Sino‐nasal outcome test (SNOT‐22) questionnaire, assessing symptoms of chronic rhinosinusitis and health related QOL.ResultsTwenty‐seven patients (56% females), age 19.4 ± 10.5 years were included; their, FEV1 was 74.6 ± 22.7%, and RV/TLC was (157.3 ± 39.3% predicted). Health perception and lower respiratory symptoms domains of PCD‐QOL had the lowest score (median [IQR]: 50 [33.3−64.6] and 57.1 [38.9−72.2], respectively). FOT parameters correlated with several PCD‐QOL domains. R5 z‐score (indicating total airway resistance) and AX z‐score (indicating airway reactance) correlated negatively with physical domain (r = −0.598, p = .001, and r = −0.42, p = .03, respectively); R5 z‐score also correlated negatively with hearing domain (r = −0.57, p = .002). R5‐20 z‐score (indicating small airway resistance) correlated negatively with role domain (r = −0.49, p = .03). SNOT‐22 score correlated negatively with several PCD‐QOL domains (lower respiratory symptoms r = −0.77, p < .001; physical r = −0.72, p < .001; upper respiratory symptoms r = −0.66, p < .001). No correlations were found between spirometry values, LCI, 6MWT, and PCD‐QOL.ConclusionsFOT suggested small airway dysfunction, and correlated negatively with several PCD‐QOL domains. Nasal symptoms had strong negative correlations with PCD‐QOL. Larger longitudinal studies will further elucidate factors affecting QOL in PCD.

show abstract

Sino‐Nasal Outcome Test–22

Abstract: The Hebrew version of SNOT-22 questionnaire is a valid outcome measure for patients with CRS with or without nasal polyps.

Cited by 28 publications

References 17 publications

Psychometric Arabic Sino-Nasal Outcome Test-22: validation and translation in chronic rhinosinusitis patients

Psychometric Arabic Sino-Nasal Outcome Test-22: validation and translation in chronic rhinosinusitis patients

How face masks influence the sinonasal quality of life during the COVID-19 pandemic

Pulmonary functions, nasal symptoms, and quality of life in patients with primary ciliary dyskinesia (PCD)

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About