2002
DOI: 10.1099/00221287-148-3-627
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sinorhizobial chemotaxis: a departure from the enterobacterial paradigm a aTo Professor Wolfram Heumann on his 87th birthday.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
48
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This mechanism is in contrast to the behavior of E. coli, which relies on short-term reversals of rotation direction keeping its flagellar rotation speed rather constant. However, chemotaxis based solely on rotation speed modulation has been reported for Sinorhizobium meliloti (32), but this soil bacterium exhibits no true chemotaxis and relies clearly on temporal gradient sensing. Furthermore, the fact that the ends of the vibrioid cells traces a left-handed helix implies that the flagella rotate clockwise if seen from behind, whereas the flagella of other bacteria such as E. coli typically rotate counter-clockwise during straight swimming paths (5).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This mechanism is in contrast to the behavior of E. coli, which relies on short-term reversals of rotation direction keeping its flagellar rotation speed rather constant. However, chemotaxis based solely on rotation speed modulation has been reported for Sinorhizobium meliloti (32), but this soil bacterium exhibits no true chemotaxis and relies clearly on temporal gradient sensing. Furthermore, the fact that the ends of the vibrioid cells traces a left-handed helix implies that the flagella rotate clockwise if seen from behind, whereas the flagella of other bacteria such as E. coli typically rotate counter-clockwise during straight swimming paths (5).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the first, the type-A ARRs may compete with positively acting type-B ARRs for phosphoryl transfer from the upstream AHPs, similar to the chemotaxis system in Sinorhizobium meliloti (Schmitt, 2002). A second model is that type-A ARRs regulate the pathway through direct or indirect interactions with pathway components, as observed in Escherichia coli chemotaxis (Bourret and Stock, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, only one CheY protein (CheY2) interacts with the flagellar motor when phosphorylated and, therefore, controls flagellar rotation directly, while the second CheY protein (CheY1) functions as a modulator of the chemotactic response by acting as a phosphate sink which drains away the phosphoryl group from CheY2~P via retro-phosphorylation of the histidine kinase CheA. Since CheY1 is present in S. meliloti in a tenfold excess over CheA, retro-phosphorylation in the signal transduction chain is an efficient mechanism for dephosphorylation of CheY2~P (Schmitt, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%