2009
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01733.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sinus augmentation analysis revised: the gradient of graft consolidation

Abstract: Based on the graft consolidation gradient, the impact of bone substitutes to modulate the process of bone formation and the kinetic of degradation within a distinct region of the augmented sinus can be investigated.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

21
72
1
6

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(100 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
21
72
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…This anatomical variation might be related to the different origin of animals previously used. 6,17,[19][20][21][22][23][24] However, BIC values after 6 and 12 weeks were comparable or even higher than in previous studies using the same model. 17,19,22 Due to the very variable but most often limited size of the sinus cavity, the same amount of DBBM (by weight) could not be applied in all surgical sites.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 44%
“…This anatomical variation might be related to the different origin of animals previously used. 6,17,[19][20][21][22][23][24] However, BIC values after 6 and 12 weeks were comparable or even higher than in previous studies using the same model. 17,19,22 Due to the very variable but most often limited size of the sinus cavity, the same amount of DBBM (by weight) could not be applied in all surgical sites.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 44%
“…From there, the values decreased significantly with increasing distance from the local jawbone (ROI 6). The results are comparable to those described by Busenlechner et al [30] and Fuerst et al [31], who investigated the gradient of NBF in different osteoconductive bone substitute materials during sinus floor augmentations in a curve-based manner. After 12 weeks, the gradient of NBF differed from that after 1 month.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The data presented are in line with the results of a preclinical study in 10 minipigs using the same pasteous nano-crystalline hydroxyapatite bone substitute [37] that investigated the “bridging distance” in 0 to 1 mm distance to the host bone, the “region of graft consolidation” in 2 to 3 mm distance, and the “region of ceasing bone formation” in 4 to 5 mm distance: after 12 weeks, the bone volume was 53.3%, 26.4%, and 5.8% and the bone substitute volume was 6.2%, 24.5%, and 41.2%, respectively, in the three defined regions. While comparison seems limited due to difference in study design, the percentage decrease in histologic bone volume (−47.5%) appears greater than the percentage decrease of radiographic bone density in the present investigation (−22.7%) due to the fact that pasteous bone substitute material presents with a certain amount of inherent radiographic density, even though no bone formation has occurred yet.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%