2017
DOI: 10.21608/edj.2017.74752
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sinus Floor Augmentation With Simultaneous Implant Placement Using Bio-Oss With and Without Prf: Clinical Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The MPM group had statistically significant (p≤0.05) higher bone densities than those of PRF at all of the follow up intervals. These finding are in agreement with those of Arafat et al (41) who used PRF added to Bio-Oss in cases of implants accompanied with sinus lift procedure, and also with other clinical studies. (42)(43)(44) Regarding the bone height levels around the implants presented in our study, there was no statistically significant difference (P ≥ 0.05) between the two groups at all of the follow up intervals except that group I showed a statistically significant (P ≥ 0.05) higher mesial bone height level at 3and 6 months postoperatively accompanied by a statistically significant (P ≥ 0.05) higher distal bone level as well at 6 months postoperatively than that of group II.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The MPM group had statistically significant (p≤0.05) higher bone densities than those of PRF at all of the follow up intervals. These finding are in agreement with those of Arafat et al (41) who used PRF added to Bio-Oss in cases of implants accompanied with sinus lift procedure, and also with other clinical studies. (42)(43)(44) Regarding the bone height levels around the implants presented in our study, there was no statistically significant difference (P ≥ 0.05) between the two groups at all of the follow up intervals except that group I showed a statistically significant (P ≥ 0.05) higher mesial bone height level at 3and 6 months postoperatively accompanied by a statistically significant (P ≥ 0.05) higher distal bone level as well at 6 months postoperatively than that of group II.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Respecting radiographic assessment of bar locator versus bar ball, digital periapical radiographs were used for measuring peri-implant bone level changes, periapical radiographs, and Cone Beam Computerized Tomography CBCTs were reported to be acceptable methods (16) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus the record of the current study was taken on CBCT for its accuracy as supported and used by several studies. SHEREEN, 2017;LIU et al, 2013) Micro implant system is one of the most famous brands in Italy with a very high reputation in Europe. Its product is of universal design, relatively simple structure and unique surface coasting, which on the one hand ensures stable connection of the implant with the alveolar bone in patients, and on the other hand can prevent bacterial invasion to the inside implant, leading to good durability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%