Sinus of Valsalva aneurysm: Defining the optimal approach

Abstract

Sinus of Valsalva aneurysm (SVA) is relatively rare, especially in Western countries, and reports on long‐term results after surgical SVA repair in a sizable patient cohort are scarce. In this issue of the Journal of Cardiac Surgery, Chaganti and colleagues publish their surgical experience over the past 30 years in 216 patients with SVA. SVAs were closed via a dual approach, with (1) patch closure (80%) or direct closure (20%) of the base of the fistula through aortotomy and (2) direct closure of the ruptured tip through the chamber of rupture. Aortic valve replacement (9.7%) or repair (6.5%) was performed for moderate to severe aortic regurgitation (AR). There was no hospital mortality. During a mean follow‐up of 10 years, no patient had residual/recurrent shunting. The actual survival at 10 years was 99%, with only two deaths. Freedom from moderate or severe AR was 98.5% at 10 years. Early and long‐term results after surgical repair of SVA were excellent in their 216 patients with a mean follow‐up of 10 years. Their dual approach for SVA was effective in preventing residual/recurrent shunting. The need for AVR in 10% of the patients speaks to the importance of follow‐up. The current report provides strong support for surgical repair being the preferred management for SVA.

Presentación atípica de rotura de seno de Valsalva derecho aneurismático con insuficiencia aortica severa

“…El pronóstico viene condicionado por la progresión hacia insuficiencia cardíaca y el riesgo de complicaciones graves como la endocarditis en el 21% de los casos (3,5,10) . Solo en defectos asintomáticos y de muy pequeño tamaño podría considerarse una vigilancia estrecha trimestral con estudios ecocardiográficos, asumiendo que un porcentaje elevado de estos defectos (43,4%) requerirá intervención en el seguimiento en al menos dentro de los dos primeros años (3,11,12) .…”