2016
DOI: 10.18061/ijsd.v7i0.5458
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Siobhan Davies and David Hinton in Conversation with Claudia Kappenberg, Part 1

Abstract: Siobhan Davies (SD): You'd see someone who has been at work for over forty years. I am enjoying all the experiences which have helped me get this far, but I went through a period of time when I felt that I needed to dissolve them all and not let the new work be weighed down by the previous works' failings! However, now I enjoy the remembering and seeing all the long threads and the stuff that thrived from work to work. Then (and now) I wanted to find out how to work and make with other people, and dance has be… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The multiple screenings of the work in a wide variety of contexts and the many responses to the work (as illustrated by the articles in this volume) might suggest that this is a non-issue; but how work is received, critiqued, and appreciated does matter to artists, particularly those artists who are working across disciplinary boundaries, or artists developing "a coalition of practices" that, according to Davies "makes them bolder." 12 Hinton notes how the screening conditions can alter and detract from the subtleties of the film quality, the grain of the film, and the lightingall of which impact on its reception. However, Davies also talks about the beauty of the different contexts in which the film is viewed; ATCH "transports" the viewer, but how it is received is deeply informed by and is situated within the wider context in which it is screened.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The multiple screenings of the work in a wide variety of contexts and the many responses to the work (as illustrated by the articles in this volume) might suggest that this is a non-issue; but how work is received, critiqued, and appreciated does matter to artists, particularly those artists who are working across disciplinary boundaries, or artists developing "a coalition of practices" that, according to Davies "makes them bolder." 12 Hinton notes how the screening conditions can alter and detract from the subtleties of the film quality, the grain of the film, and the lightingall of which impact on its reception. However, Davies also talks about the beauty of the different contexts in which the film is viewed; ATCH "transports" the viewer, but how it is received is deeply informed by and is situated within the wider context in which it is screened.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%