1980
DOI: 10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(80)83084-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sire Evaluation by Best Linear Unbiased Prediction for Categorically Scored Type Traits

Abstract: Best linear unbiased prediction to predict category frequencies of future progeny of a sire for type traits scored in mutually exclusive categories is described. The method accounts for automatic covariances among categories and is comparable to prediction for multiple traits. The method does not require linearity of measurements and also allows nonlinear economic values to be assigned to each category after frequencies are predicted. Evaluations were for 12 descriptive type traits for 712 Brown Swiss bulls ha… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1982
1982
1990
1990

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Two sets of equations for sire evaluation (12) were chosen for categorically scored traits of front end (5 categories = 4 subtraits) and stature (3 categories = 2 subtraits) corresponding to traits with low and moderately high herit- i (e,e).S/(r,r).S < C.…”
Section: Data Setsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Two sets of equations for sire evaluation (12) were chosen for categorically scored traits of front end (5 categories = 4 subtraits) and stature (3 categories = 2 subtraits) corresponding to traits with low and moderately high herit- i (e,e).S/(r,r).S < C.…”
Section: Data Setsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prediction of category frequencies for traits such as calving difficulty and type traits by best linear unbiased prediction is a special form of multiple trait evaluation of sires. Such sets of equations were available from analysis of Brown Swiss type data (12). Equations for a test set of data and for the complete data set were available for multiple subtraits of two traits, the first having three categories (equivalent to two traits) and the second having five categories (equivalent to four traits).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%