2017
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stx1892
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Siriusly, a newly identified intermediate-age Milky Way stellar cluster: a spectroscopic study of Gaia 1

Abstract: We confirm the reality of the recently discovered Milky Way stellar cluster Gaia 1 using spectra acquired with the HERMES and AAOmega spectrographs of the Anglo-Australian Telescope. This cluster had been previously undiscovered due to its close angular proximity to Sirius, the brightest star in the sky at visual wavelengths. Our observations identified 41 cluster members, and yielded an overall metallicity of [Fe/H] = −0.13 ± 0.13 and barycentric radial velocity of v r = 58.30 ± 0.22 km/s. These kinematics pr… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

7
17
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
7
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Subsequently, Mucciarelli et al (2017) measured chemical abundances of six stars in Gaia 1, suggesting an equally high metallicity, but based on their abundance study, the suggestion of an extragalactic origin was revoked. While a more metal-rich nature found by the latter authors conformed with the results by Simpson et al (2017), the evolutionary diagrams of both studies are very dissimilar and could not be explained by one simple isochrone fit. In particular, it was noted that "the Simpson et al (2017) stars do not define a red giant branch in the theoretical plane, suggesting that their parameters are not correct" (Fig.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Subsequently, Mucciarelli et al (2017) measured chemical abundances of six stars in Gaia 1, suggesting an equally high metallicity, but based on their abundance study, the suggestion of an extragalactic origin was revoked. While a more metal-rich nature found by the latter authors conformed with the results by Simpson et al (2017), the evolutionary diagrams of both studies are very dissimilar and could not be explained by one simple isochrone fit. In particular, it was noted that "the Simpson et al (2017) stars do not define a red giant branch in the theoretical plane, suggesting that their parameters are not correct" (Fig.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…While a more metal-rich nature found by the latter authors conformed with the results by Simpson et al (2017), the evolutionary diagrams of both studies are very dissimilar and could not be explained by one simple isochrone fit. In particular, it was noted that "the Simpson et al (2017) stars do not define a red giant branch in the theoretical plane, suggesting that their parameters are not correct" (Fig. 1 of Mucciarelli et al 2017).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The O M software developed by the team is used to select a field that will be near the meridian at the time of observation. This field is required to be at least 30 degrees from the Moon, to have a relatively small change in airmass over the exposure time, and to have no Solar System planets within it at the time of observation (as bright sources such as Jupiter have caused trouble with scattered light contaminating spectra in previous 2dF survey observations, though HERMES has been found to suffer much less from this than AAOmega; see Simpson et al 2017). Fiducial targets, used for field acquisition and guiding, are chosen from the stars with 11 V 12 in the input catalogue that are located in the field.…”
Section: Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second data release of the Gaia mission (Prusti et al 2016;Brown et al 2018) has revolutionized our view of the Milky Way Galaxy. Among its many results, it has proven very useful for investigating purported stellar clusters, in many cases confirming their existence (e.g., Simpson et al 2017b;Soubiran et al 2018;Cantat-Gaudin et al 2018), but in some cases showing they are not real physical associations (e.g., Kos et al 2018). The precise proper motions are especially helpful in the Milky Way bulge, where imaging surveys are hampered by the large and differential reddening and extinction, resulting in clusters hidden from easy view.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%