1983
DOI: 10.1068/b100347
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SIRO-PLAN and LUPLAN: an Australian approach to land-use planning. 2. The LUPLAN land-use planning package

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While, e.g., Ive and Cocks [91], Fischer and Makowski [92], Suhaedi et al [93] and Lu et al [94] applied an interactive multiple-goal linear programming method (IMGLP) for land use planning purposes. De Wit et al [95] did so with the analysis of agricultural development policies.…”
Section: Integrating Scenarios For Strategy Planningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While, e.g., Ive and Cocks [91], Fischer and Makowski [92], Suhaedi et al [93] and Lu et al [94] applied an interactive multiple-goal linear programming method (IMGLP) for land use planning purposes. De Wit et al [95] did so with the analysis of agricultural development policies.…”
Section: Integrating Scenarios For Strategy Planningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies into systematic land use planning for natural resource management and conservation (Ive and Cocks, 1983;Rothley, 1999;Recatala et al, 2000;Hajkowicz et al, 2005;Hill et al, 2005), as well as the systematic approaches to agricultural resource planning (Hayashi, 2000), have benefited from quantitative methods originating in the operations research and decision theory disciplines. This study contributes to this literature by incorporating spatial optimisation into a decision analysis framework for the specific task of integrated planning for natural resource management.…”
Section: Implications For Natural Resource Management Planningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A general purpose program, LUPLAN (Ive and Cocks 1983), was rewritten in COBOL for this application and provided with the 18 land uses, the policy set, and the data. With the aid of this program it was possible to incorporate the changes to the weights (and, if necessary, the policies and their ratings) and obtain a new plan with a turnaround time of two days; the evaluation of each plan by the planning team and the shire planning committee took longer than two days and there was no advantage in running the program on a faster machine.…”
Section: Incorporating Political Valuesmentioning
confidence: 99%