2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2010.04.045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sirolimus in Liver Transplant Recipients: A Large Single-Center Experience

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If confirmed in the clinic, the use of HOPE may open the door for regimens with significant low or delayed calcineurin inhibitors without a risk of graft rejection, but less toxic effects in high MELD recipients or donated after cardiac death liver transplants. 33,34 In addition, underlying recipient diseases that require minimal immunosuppressive treatment, that is, recurrent hepatitis C, 35 or advanced hepatic tumors 36 could benefit from this new strategy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If confirmed in the clinic, the use of HOPE may open the door for regimens with significant low or delayed calcineurin inhibitors without a risk of graft rejection, but less toxic effects in high MELD recipients or donated after cardiac death liver transplants. 33,34 In addition, underlying recipient diseases that require minimal immunosuppressive treatment, that is, recurrent hepatitis C, 35 or advanced hepatic tumors 36 could benefit from this new strategy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Statement 11: Use of mTORi is recommended for patients with de novo malignancies after LT. 40,41,45-47 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Introduction of mTOR-inhibitors to the immunosuppressive therapy protocols guided to lower tumour incidence among transplant patients in general [16]. Coadministration of sorafenib and an mTOR in- hibitor could be eff ective in patients with posttransplant HCC recurrence not suitable for radical therapy, but the toxicity and effi cacy need to be further evaluated [17].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%