2005
DOI: 10.1159/000088106
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sirolimus- versus Paclitaxel-Eluting Stent Implantation for Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Stenosis

Abstract: We performed this study in order to compare the immediate and mid-term outcomes of sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) and paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES) in lesions of the unprotected left main coronary artery (LMCA). We assessed 54 patients from 5 centers who had undergone unprotected LMCA stenting (35 SES and 19 PES). The procedural success rates were 100 and 95%, respectively, in the SES and PES patients (p = 0.19). At the 6-month clinical follow-up, the event-free probability was 100% in the SES group, and 88%… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The widespread use of drug-eluting stents has resulted in a large reduction in the restenosis rate and the need for target lesion revascularization after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with renal insufficiency (RI) [1, 2]. However, an elevated occurrence rate of stent thrombosis (ST) after implantation of drug-eluting stentsraises a genuine safety concern [3,4,5,6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The widespread use of drug-eluting stents has resulted in a large reduction in the restenosis rate and the need for target lesion revascularization after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with renal insufficiency (RI) [1, 2]. However, an elevated occurrence rate of stent thrombosis (ST) after implantation of drug-eluting stentsraises a genuine safety concern [3,4,5,6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This standard is being challenged by DES. Table 2 summarizes eight registry reports that have evaluated DES in the treatment of unprotected LMCA stenosis [48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55]. Procedural success was high in all reported series (90% to 100%), with low rates of in-hospital death ( 1.0%), confirming the technical feasibility of treating unprotected LMCA with DES.…”
Section: Unprotected Lmca Diseasementioning
confidence: 84%
“…30 On the other hand, recent observational studies and randomized trials comparing PTCA with stenting to CABG in the management of LMCA lesion are more encouraging. 24,27,31-38 Lee et al 26 and Chieffo et al 31 found better short-term outcomes in terms of death, myocardial infarction (MI) and target-vessel revascularization in PTCA with DES group. Death and MI after 6-12 months' observation were also less in DES implantation group, whereas restenosis rates were higher than that in CABG group.…”
Section: Pci Versus Cabg In Lmca Stenosismentioning
confidence: 99%