2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10495-017-1412-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SIRT6 knockout cells resist apoptosis initiation but not progression: a computational method to evaluate the progression of apoptosis

Abstract: Apoptosis is essential for numerous processes, such as development, resistance to infections, and suppression of tumorigenesis. Here, we investigate the influence of the nutrient sensing and longevity-assuring enzyme SIRT6 on the dynamics of apoptosis triggered by serum starvation. Specifically, we characterize the progression of apoptosis in wild type and SIRT6 deficient mouse embryonic fibroblasts using time-lapse flow cytometry and computational modelling based on rate-equations and cell distribution analys… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent studies have reported that SIRT6 protects from DNA-damage associated with Alzheimer’s disease (AD) [ 28 , 29 ]; more specifically, Kaluski et al showed that cells without SIRT6 succumbed to apoptosis faster, following DNA-damage induced by ionizing radiation. We find SIRT6 KO cells (fibroblast lines and primary neurons) are more resistant to apoptosis induced by oxidative damage, proteotoxicity, and nutrient shortage, which is supported by other independent studies [ 51 , 63 , 67 ] and our previous work [ 14 ]. It is possible that the effect of SIRT6 on stress-induced survival depends on the nature of the stress.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recent studies have reported that SIRT6 protects from DNA-damage associated with Alzheimer’s disease (AD) [ 28 , 29 ]; more specifically, Kaluski et al showed that cells without SIRT6 succumbed to apoptosis faster, following DNA-damage induced by ionizing radiation. We find SIRT6 KO cells (fibroblast lines and primary neurons) are more resistant to apoptosis induced by oxidative damage, proteotoxicity, and nutrient shortage, which is supported by other independent studies [ 51 , 63 , 67 ] and our previous work [ 14 ]. It is possible that the effect of SIRT6 on stress-induced survival depends on the nature of the stress.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…However, SIRT6 activity can also promote apoptosis in non-cancer cells, including neurons [ 9 , 43 ]. In fact, SIRT6 inhibition was recently demonstrated to suppress stress-induced apoptosis [ 14 , 51 ] and protect from retinal neurodegeneration [ 67 ]. SIRT6 promotes production and secretion of inflammatory cytokines [ 4 , 26 , 27 , 62 ], and chronic inflammation is thought to underlie neuronal death in PD and other neurodegenerative diseases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To test this, we stressed cells with nutrient deprivation or rotenone exposure. Survival of cells was measured by staining with the apoptosis markers annexin-V and propidium iodide followed by flow cytometry, as described previously (Domanskyi et al 2017). Fibroblasts from longlived breeds survived on average 8% more after rotenone challenge (*p = 0.01) (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In accordance with our study, SIRT6 overexpression-induced apoptosis, activated caspase-9 and caspase-3 in human gastric cancer cells, resulting in cell cycle arrest, induced cellular apoptosis through inactivation of JAK2/STAT3 signaling, and by downregulation of cyclin D1 and Bcl2. 28 Apoptosis was also observed in A549 non-small-cell lung cancer cells, 29 mouse embryonic fibroblasts, 30 and hepatocellular carcinoma, 10 with downregulation of cell survival proteins (JAK2/STAT3 and Bcl-2), and upregulation of pro-apoptotic proteins (p53 and E2F-1, Bid and bax). However, several reports implicate a suppressive role of SIRT6 in cellular apoptosis, which is inconsistent with the results of our study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%