2022
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2203.07824
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SISL:Self-Supervised Image Signature Learning for Splicing Detection and Localization

Abstract: Recent algorithms for image manipulation detection almost exclusively use deep network models. These approaches require either dense pixelwise groundtruth masks, camera ids, or image metadata to train the networks. On one hand, constructing a training set to represent the countless tampering possibilities is impractical. On the other hand, social media platforms or commercial applications are often constrained to remove camera ids as well as metadata from images. A self-supervised algorithm for training manipu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 43 publications
(87 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, this method is often limited in social media platforms or commercial applications. In 2022, Agrawal et al [58] proposed a method of Self-Supervised Image Signature Learning (SISL) to train a splice detection localization model from image frequency transformation, as shown in Fig. 6.…”
Section: Splicing Tampering Detection Based On Deep Learning 31 Splic...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, this method is often limited in social media platforms or commercial applications. In 2022, Agrawal et al [58] proposed a method of Self-Supervised Image Signature Learning (SISL) to train a splice detection localization model from image frequency transformation, as shown in Fig. 6.…”
Section: Splicing Tampering Detection Based On Deep Learning 31 Splic...mentioning
confidence: 99%