2017
DOI: 10.20527/jtiulm.v2i1.14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penilaian Kinerja Dosen Dengan Metode Ahp Dan Saw

Abstract: Assessment of lecturer's performance so far is done by excel calculation and still very subjektif. This study discusses and makes an Application Decision Support System Assessment Performance Lecturer Islamic University of Kalimantan MAB Faculty of Information Technology Using AHP and SAW Method to obtain results that accuracy and validity high computerized. The calculation of student quesioner, peer, leader and self using SAW method, then its value becomes new criteria combined with internal academic calculat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
0
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Bersumber dari penelitian terdahulu, metode penilaian kinerja dosen yang digunakan adalah Simple Additive Weigting (SAW), Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), Profile Machine Method, Performace Prism , Multi Factor Evaluation Process (MFEP), Metode Graphic Rating Scale method, Balance Scorecard method, Profile Matching method, Weighted Product method, Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS), namun yang sering digunakan oleh peneliti untuk menilai kinerja dosen adalah Simple Additive Weigting (SAW) (Terttiaavini et al, 2019) (Denny Subagyo et al, 2017 (Mujiastuti, 2019) dan Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) (Cui and Zhang, 2018) dan kombinasinya (Fikri, Gernowo andSurarso, 2020) (Al Fath Riza Kholdani, Muflih andNur Arminarahmah, 2017).…”
Section: Pendahuluanunclassified
“…Bersumber dari penelitian terdahulu, metode penilaian kinerja dosen yang digunakan adalah Simple Additive Weigting (SAW), Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), Profile Machine Method, Performace Prism , Multi Factor Evaluation Process (MFEP), Metode Graphic Rating Scale method, Balance Scorecard method, Profile Matching method, Weighted Product method, Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS), namun yang sering digunakan oleh peneliti untuk menilai kinerja dosen adalah Simple Additive Weigting (SAW) (Terttiaavini et al, 2019) (Denny Subagyo et al, 2017 (Mujiastuti, 2019) dan Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) (Cui and Zhang, 2018) dan kombinasinya (Fikri, Gernowo andSurarso, 2020) (Al Fath Riza Kholdani, Muflih andNur Arminarahmah, 2017).…”
Section: Pendahuluanunclassified