Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Prioritas Perbaikan Gedung Menggunakan Metode Analytic Hierarchy Process Dan Profile Matching

Abstract

Gedung bertingkat memiliki banyak sub elemen, elemen, sub komponen dan komponen di tiap bagian struktur, arsitektur, dan utilitasnya. Kerna kompleksnya elemen dan sub elemen di dalam bangunan gedung bertingkat, sehingga diperlukan rencana kegiatan dan mekanisme yang terencana untuk menentukan prioritas perbaikan. Penelitian ini mengkaji implementasi Sistem Pendukung Keputusan (SPK) untuk menentukan prioritas perbaikan gedung berdasarkan aspek kerusakan pada sub elemen, elemen, dan komponen. Metode SPK yang digunakan yaitu Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) dan Profile Matching. Metode AHP digunakan untuk menentukan priority vector atau bobot prioritas sub elemen, elemen, dan komponen, sedangkan Profile Matching digunakan untuk menentukan perangkingan gedung yang menjadi prioritas perbaikan berdasarkan pengukuran volume kerusakan, jenis kerusakan, nilai pengurang dan faktor koreksi serta nilai Skala Indeks Kondisi Mckay pada sub elemen, elemen dan komponen gedung.

Building Maintenance Priority Decision Support System Using the Method Profile Matching

“…Profile match method (profile matching) or the gap method, is a mechanism in decision-making by assuming that there is an ideal predictor variable level that must be owned by the subject being reviewed. Method profile matching is one of the appropriate methods used in determining building maintenance priorities because there is an ideal level of predictor variables that must be met by alternative competencies, in this case the results of assessing building conditions (Hamka and Harjono, 2019). The results of the building condition assessment will then calculate the value of the Sub Element Condition Index (IKSE) and Element Condition Index (IKE) of the building and will calculate the gap value based on these indicators.…”

“…Value acquisition gap for each ideal profile obtained from the weighting calculation process. The value of the weighting itself is an assessment of the weight gap based on the following table (Hamka and Harjono, 2019). The assessments carried out were divided into two groups, namely, core factor and the secondary factor.…”

“…Core factor itself is the most needed aspect or competency, in this case, it is the most important building element in the building structure. Where is the value of core factor obtained from the formula (Hamka and Harjono, 2019) the following: = Total variables for core factor The secondary factor or also known as the structural support factor of the building is a value obtained from a review of aspects other than those contained in a core factor. For the value of the secondary factor obtained from the formula (Hamka and Harjono, 2019) the following:…”

“…In addition, several previous studies related to determining maintenance priorities were carried out based on the components studied such as architecture, structure, utilities, and environmental planning (Hartono et al, 2017). Meanwhile, according to Hamka and Harjono, it was explained that the priority for building repairs was carried out based on building damage that occurred in the sub-elements, elements, and components of the building (Hamka and Harjono, 2019).…”

Priority of Maintenance of Structural and Architectural Elements Using the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) Method

“…Therefore, school buildings need to be taken seriously, especially in terms of maintenance [2]. [3], [4] , [5], [6].…”