2022
DOI: 10.1007/s11069-022-05713-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Site amplification and rupture velocity in EXSIM and updated EXSIM during the 2017 Mw6.6 Jiuzhaigou, China earthquake

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 17 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The figure indicates that the H/V curves at stations 053BCJ, 053YBX, 053DLY, and 053YPX shows multiple peak characteristics, this may be due to the existence of multiple impedance interfaces under the surface where these stations are located or the resonance of S‐wave (Lu & Wang, 2018). Application of H/V ratio method in different site types, such as Class A, B, C, and D sites, has been detailed discussed by previous studies (Dang, Cui, & Liu, 2023; Dang et al., 2022) suggesting that the crustal and local site amplification functions should be used for soft soil sites. In this simulation, the stress drop was determined by the trail‐and‐error method to yield the minimum error between the predicted and observed values.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The figure indicates that the H/V curves at stations 053BCJ, 053YBX, 053DLY, and 053YPX shows multiple peak characteristics, this may be due to the existence of multiple impedance interfaces under the surface where these stations are located or the resonance of S‐wave (Lu & Wang, 2018). Application of H/V ratio method in different site types, such as Class A, B, C, and D sites, has been detailed discussed by previous studies (Dang, Cui, & Liu, 2023; Dang et al., 2022) suggesting that the crustal and local site amplification functions should be used for soft soil sites. In this simulation, the stress drop was determined by the trail‐and‐error method to yield the minimum error between the predicted and observed values.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%