2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.livprodsci.2004.02.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Site and extent of starch digestion of whole-plant maize silages differing in maturity stage and chop length, in dairy cows

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

8
10
2
4

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
8
10
2
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The chemical composition of maize varies between different cultivars, ensiling processes, growth conditions and stages of maturity (Fernandez et al, 2004;Jensen et al, 2005;González et al, 2010). This variation results in variable rumen degradation of dietary nutrients (Ali et al, 2012) that should be taken into account when determining the feeding value of maize silages.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The chemical composition of maize varies between different cultivars, ensiling processes, growth conditions and stages of maturity (Fernandez et al, 2004;Jensen et al, 2005;González et al, 2010). This variation results in variable rumen degradation of dietary nutrients (Ali et al, 2012) that should be taken into account when determining the feeding value of maize silages.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Information on the relationship between chemical composition and in situ rumen degradation characteristics of dry matter (DM), organic matter (OM), CP, starch and neutral detergent fiber (NDF) of maize silages in the scientific literature is scarce. Several in situ studies have been conducted on maize silages to determine the effect of individual factors such as maturity stage (Johnson et al, 1999;Di Marco et al, 2002;Jensen et al, 2005), chop length (Fernandez et al, 2004) and ensiling (González et al, 2010) of maize crop on the rumen degradation of specific nutrients like DM (Von Keyserlingk et al, 1996), OM (Arieli et al, 1998), CP (Von Keyserlingk et al, 1996;Shannak et al, 2000), starch (Fernandez et al, 2004;Hindle et al, 2005) and NDF (Varga and Hoover, 1983;Stensig et al, 1994;Jensen et al, 2005). In addition, often in these studies only a limited number (n = 1 to 12) of samples were investigated and compared with other feedstuffs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Earlier studies show that maize maturity at harvest strongly affects the performance of growing cattle (Browne et al, 2004;Bal et al, 1997;Fernandez et al, 2004;Keady et al, 2008). It has been suggested that the optimum maturity stage of maize at harvest for growing cattle is that of dough or dent stage, at circa 30% DM and 30% starch (Zaralis et al, 2014;Keady et al, 2008).…”
Section: Effects Of Maize Maturity Stage At Harvestmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of the variation results from differing vitreousness (Philippeau et al 1999;Correa et al 2002) and particle size (Fernandez et al 2004;Remond et al 2004). Kernel vitreousness is expressed by vitreous endosperm as a percentage of total endosperm and is influenced by endosperm type (dent, semi-flint, flint) and maturity stage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%