2021
DOI: 10.1007/s12517-021-07231-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Site characterization of strong-motion stations of Himalaya and adjoining plains

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Litho-tectonic features subdivide the Himalaya into four categories viz. Teyths Himalaya, Higher Himalaya, Lesser Himalaya, and sub-Himalaya or Shivaliks and their adjoining north-south plans (Pandey et al, 2021). Geodynamic complexity has exhibited in several thrust planes, and prominent are viz.…”
Section: Geological Settingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Litho-tectonic features subdivide the Himalaya into four categories viz. Teyths Himalaya, Higher Himalaya, Lesser Himalaya, and sub-Himalaya or Shivaliks and their adjoining north-south plans (Pandey et al, 2021). Geodynamic complexity has exhibited in several thrust planes, and prominent are viz.…”
Section: Geological Settingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The soil strata's layering information was collected from available literature (Pandey et al 2016(Pandey et al , 2021. Similarly, the dynamic properties for the corresponding soil type of each layer are selected from the literature.…”
Section: Equivalent Linear 1-d Ground Response Analysis (Theoretical ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…VS profiles of the Indian sites are obtained from the available literature (Pandey et al 2016(Pandey et al , 2021, and Kik-Net sites are obtained from the webpage http://www.kyoshin.bosai.go.jp, which were used for ground response analysis. Multiple ground response analysis was performed for each site using VS profiles up to different depths extracted from the original VS profile (Figure 1)…”
Section: Site Classification and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The sites used in this study belong to NEHRP site classes C and D. For this study, these sites were further divided into six groups in terms of VS,30 and depth of engineering bedrock (EB) (EB is considered as the first layer which has VS greater than 760 m/s) as follows; 235 The details of sites belonging to the Indian strong motion network and Japanese network are 242 presented in Table 1 and Table 2. 243 VS profiles of the Indian sites are obtained from the available literature (Pandey et al 2016(Pandey et al , 2021, and Kik-Net sites are obtained from the webpage http://www.kyoshin.bosai.go.jp, which were used for ground response analysis. Multiple ground response analysis was performed for each site using VS profiles up to different depths extracted from the original VS profile (Figure 1) to study the bedrock effect.…”
Section: Site Classification and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%