The mechanism of protein–polyelectrolyte
complexation on
the wrong side of the isoelectric point has long puzzled researchers.
Two alternative explanations have been proposed in the literature:
(a) the charge-patch (CP) mechanism, based on the inhomogeneous distribution
of charges on the protein, and (b) the charge-regulation (CR) mechanism,
based on the variable charge of weak acid and base groups, which may
invert the protein charge in the presence of another highly charged
object. To discern these two mechanisms, we simulated artificially
constructed short peptides, containing acidic and basic residues,
arranged in a blocklike or alternating sequence. Our simulations of
these peptides, interacting with polyelectrolytes, showed that charge
patch and charge regulation alone can both lead to adsorption on the
wrong side of the pI value. Their simultaneous presence enhances adsorption,
whereas their absence prevents adsorption. Our simulation results
were rationalized by following the variation of the charge regulation
capacity and dipole moments of these peptides with the pH. Specifically
for lysozyme, we found that charge patch prevails at physiological
pH, whereas charge regulation prevails near the pI, thereby explaining
seemingly contradicting conclusions in the literature. By applying
the same approach to other proteins, we developed a general framework
for assessing the role of the CP and CR mechanisms in existing case
studies and for predicting how various proteins interact with polyelectrolytes
at different pH values.