1995
DOI: 10.1016/0376-7388(95)00135-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Site-directed and random enzyme immobilization on functionalized membranes: kinetic studies and models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
17
0
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
3
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is consistent with the fact that the His-tag ALP may partially bind to Ni-TiO 2 with the same orientation that maximally exposes the active sites. This result is comparable with the literature, as Vishwanath and co-workers (17) reported that the activity of oriented immobilized enzyme is higher than that of the randomly immobilized enzyme. This is important for biosensor applications where the amount of available surface may be low and so high retention of catalytic activity is essential.…”
Section: ϫ10supporting
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is consistent with the fact that the His-tag ALP may partially bind to Ni-TiO 2 with the same orientation that maximally exposes the active sites. This result is comparable with the literature, as Vishwanath and co-workers (17) reported that the activity of oriented immobilized enzyme is higher than that of the randomly immobilized enzyme. This is important for biosensor applications where the amount of available surface may be low and so high retention of catalytic activity is essential.…”
Section: ϫ10supporting
confidence: 94%
“…Interference could be due to the presence of chemical compounds (i.e., organometallic compounds) which induce the opening of a transition pore with consequent swelling even under nonenergized conditions (17). In this case, however, by operating in the presence of Cyclosporine, the inhibitor of the permeant pore, the interferences are excluded.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Finally, attachment through multiple residues may lead to crosslinking among and within the enzyme molecules, and to structural rigidity of the immobilized enzyme. The result of all these factors is a significant loss in the activity of the immobilized enzyme (Rao et al, 1998;Vishwanath et al, 1995;, which is not uncommon to be <20% of the activity of the same enzyme in solution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…116 Membranes have high surface area for enzyme loads and provide strong covalent attachment. 117 In the TSP-EMR, the preferred method to immobilize the enzymes is adsorption through cross-flow filtration. This method recirculates an enzyme solution from one side to the other side of the HFM (shell-to lumen-side or the other way) causing the enzyme to adsorb to the membrane layers.…”
Section: Enzyme Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%