“…cerevisiae strains used were YLL302 (MATa ade2-1 his3⌬200 ura3-52 leu2-3,112 trp1⌬1 rrp2⌬::HIS3/pTOP4), derived from MES 106 (Schmitt & Clayton, 1992), and JLY1 (MATa ade2-1 his3-11,15 leu 2-3,112 trp1-1 ura3-1 can1-100 rpr1::HIS3/pB-H RNP-Ycp50 (RPR1 URA3 ); Pagan-Ramos et al+, 1996)+ Plasmid vectors used were YCplac33 (URA3 ) and YCplac22 (TRP1) (Gietz & Sugino, 1988)+ The wild-type RPR1 gene was carried by a YCplac22 derivative with 408 nt upstream of 59 end of mature P RNA and 254 nt downstream of 39 end of the mature P RNA+ Two plasmids carrying the wild-type RRP2 (alias NME1; Schmitt & Clayton, 1992) were used: pTOP4 (URA3 ) and pDK38 (TRP1)+ The pDK38 plasmid was generated by PCR amplification of genomic DNA and includes 184 bp upstream and 206 bp downstream of RRP2+ It has an A r T change in position 127 relative to the published sequence (Schmitt & Clayton, 1992), apparently generated during the PCR reaction+ The pTOP4 plasmid carries a Bgl II-EcoRI genomic fragment (Chu et al+, 1994) and has an A r G change at position 69 and a T r C change at position 265 (apparently reflecting a polymorphism in the MRP RNA sequence)+ Cells carrying a deletion of the chromosomal RRP2 gene and relying on either pDK38 or pTOP4 as the source of MRP RNA have a growth rate and a distribution of short, long, and very long 5+8S rRNAthat are indistinguishable from wild-type strains (Chu et al+, 1994; our unpubl+ results)+ For the purpose of these studies we consider both of these plasmid-encoded RRP2 genes to be wild-type+ DNA fragments containing mutated derivatives of RRP2 and RPR1 (Fig+ 1 inserts) were made using the SOE technique (Ho et al+, 1989) or standard PCR DNA technology and cloned in YCplac22+ The entire RRP2 and RPR1 genes were sequenced to confirm that they contained the desired substitutions+…”