2010
DOI: 10.5194/nhess-10-761-2010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Site effects and soil-structure resonance study in the Kobarid basin (NW Slovenia) using microtremors

Abstract: Abstract. The town of Kobarid is located in one of three areas with the highest seismic hazard in Slovenia. It was hit by several [1976][1977] Friuli sequence earthquakes and recently by the 1998 and 2004 Krn Mountains earthquakes which caused damage of intensity up to VII EMS-98 scale. The town is located in a small basin filled with heterogeneous glaciofluvial Quaternary sediments in which site effects due to soft sediments are expected. The existing microzonation which is based on surface geological data on… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
40
0
7

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
40
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 5b shows amplification of PSA as a function of period for V S30 = 100 m/s, typical of the Jakarta Basin, and values of Z 1.0 ranging from 100 to 1500 m. The amplification curve for Z 1.0 = 100 m exhibits a pronounced peak at period 0.8 s, and this peak broadens and its period increases to 1.5 s and 2.0-2.5 s for Z 1.0 = 500 and 1000 m, respectively, but changes little in amplitude or period range for Z 1.0 = 1500 m. A typical HVSR curve for the Jakarta Basin, on the other hand, exhibits a pronounced peak at around 6 s (some curves such as this one also exhibit a secondary peak at shorter periods, see Cipta et al [13]. While the HVSR curve does not necessarily represent the amplification of seismic waves, its peak period is widely regarded as coinciding with that of S-wave amplification Nakamura [37], it has been used to explain spatial patterns of earthquake damage Gosar [38], and it agrees with the fundamental period of S-wave resonant oscillation calculated form the Jakarta Basin velocity models of both Cipta et al [13] and Saygin et al [39]. Thus, the basin parameters calculated for the Jakarta Basin model of Cipta et al [13], appear to lie outside the range of values used for the development of the deep sediment corrections of CY2014, and the period dependence of CY2014 predictions for PSA using these corrections do not agree with the characteristics of ground motion implied by observed HVSR curves.…”
Section: Ground Motion Prediction Equations (Gmpes)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 5b shows amplification of PSA as a function of period for V S30 = 100 m/s, typical of the Jakarta Basin, and values of Z 1.0 ranging from 100 to 1500 m. The amplification curve for Z 1.0 = 100 m exhibits a pronounced peak at period 0.8 s, and this peak broadens and its period increases to 1.5 s and 2.0-2.5 s for Z 1.0 = 500 and 1000 m, respectively, but changes little in amplitude or period range for Z 1.0 = 1500 m. A typical HVSR curve for the Jakarta Basin, on the other hand, exhibits a pronounced peak at around 6 s (some curves such as this one also exhibit a secondary peak at shorter periods, see Cipta et al [13]. While the HVSR curve does not necessarily represent the amplification of seismic waves, its peak period is widely regarded as coinciding with that of S-wave amplification Nakamura [37], it has been used to explain spatial patterns of earthquake damage Gosar [38], and it agrees with the fundamental period of S-wave resonant oscillation calculated form the Jakarta Basin velocity models of both Cipta et al [13] and Saygin et al [39]. Thus, the basin parameters calculated for the Jakarta Basin model of Cipta et al [13], appear to lie outside the range of values used for the development of the deep sediment corrections of CY2014, and the period dependence of CY2014 predictions for PSA using these corrections do not agree with the characteristics of ground motion implied by observed HVSR curves.…”
Section: Ground Motion Prediction Equations (Gmpes)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Large variations in damage to buildings were observed especially in the Bovec (Gosar, 2007(Gosar, , 2008 and Kobarid (Gosar, 2010) basins; these variations were explained by prominent site and resonance effects between soft sediments and buildings. Apart from substantial damage to nearby settlements, the 1998 earthquake caused considerable changes to the landscape through many rockfalls and some landslides (Vidrih and Ribičič, 1999;Vidrih et al, 2001;Mikoš et al, 2006;Vidrih, 2008).…”
Section: The Earthquake On 1april 1998 In Krn Mountainsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This also presents that the propagated seismic wave could be larger, if it propagated from one medium to other soft mediums compared than the travelled previous wave. Gosar [24] also mentioned that the larger amplification could be caused due to the weak indication of relatively higher impedance contrast between the soft sediment and bedrock. Corresponding to the geological condition in the study area, Ratu Agung District is generally dominated by alluvium terraces composed by sands, silts, clays, and gravels.…”
Section: Microzonation Map Of A0mentioning
confidence: 99%