2016
DOI: 10.1177/1369433216646004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Site, local, and regional earthquake ground motion characterization and application

Abstract: A systematic overview and comparison is presented on the seismic hazard assessment based on the observations and seismic hazard model and the characteristics of earthquake ground motions for a site, a local area, and a region. It shows that the seismic hazard estimated by directly using the observations could differ from that evaluated using an adopted seismic hazard model. It indicates the importance to judiciously select the seismic hazard model, as well as to understand that historical records for a limited… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 49 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because it is developed based on a broad network of recording stations with the implicit ergodic assumption, the model may include potential bias for a particular site class or for a localized area. The potential existence of the bias was discussed in Sokolov et al 10 for the PGA of Taiwan records; there are efforts in removing the ergodic assumption by focusing on the ground motion variability at a single-station 31,32,33 but this is beyond the scope of this study. Therefore, the application of the model shown in equation (1) implicitly includes the potential bias that is similar to the one included in a ground motion prediction equation used for seismic hazard assessment and the development of the uniform hazard spectrum.…”
Section: Simulation Of Multiple-support Excitation For a Scenario Eventmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Because it is developed based on a broad network of recording stations with the implicit ergodic assumption, the model may include potential bias for a particular site class or for a localized area. The potential existence of the bias was discussed in Sokolov et al 10 for the PGA of Taiwan records; there are efforts in removing the ergodic assumption by focusing on the ground motion variability at a single-station 31,32,33 but this is beyond the scope of this study. Therefore, the application of the model shown in equation (1) implicitly includes the potential bias that is similar to the one included in a ground motion prediction equation used for seismic hazard assessment and the development of the uniform hazard spectrum.…”
Section: Simulation Of Multiple-support Excitation For a Scenario Eventmentioning
confidence: 94%