1987
DOI: 10.1007/bf00309812
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Site occupancies of minor elements in synthetic olivines as determined by channeling-enhanced X-ray emission

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It follows from the simulation results that the M1 site is energetically more favorable for monovalent than that in M1, in accordance with experimental evidence that Ca and Mn ions substitute for Mg primarily on the M2 site [37,38]. According to our calculations, trivalent impurities must preferentially occupy the M2 site.…”
Section: Computer Simulation Of Defectssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…It follows from the simulation results that the M1 site is energetically more favorable for monovalent than that in M1, in accordance with experimental evidence that Ca and Mn ions substitute for Mg primarily on the M2 site [37,38]. According to our calculations, trivalent impurities must preferentially occupy the M2 site.…”
Section: Computer Simulation Of Defectssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Polarized optical absorption spectroscopy results additionally agree on the M1 preference of this cation (Taran and Rossman 2001). Confirmation of the M2 site preference of Mn 2+ has been provided by channeling-enhanced X-ray emission spectroscopy (McCormick et al 1987). The effects of temperature on transition metal site occupancies in olivines have been extensively studied by XRD and other methods for samples typically in the range of about 10 to 50% of the non-forsterite component, and have been analyzed thermodynamically, demonstrating systematically increasing M1 preference from Fe 2+ to Co 2+ to Ni 2+ Morozov et al 2006;Heinemann et al 2007).…”
mentioning
confidence: 52%
“…() concluded that this peak is assigned to Mn almost certainly in octahedral coordination and probably concentrated in the M2 site (McCormick et al. ), compared with synthetic Mn‐doped forsterite (Steele ). In principle, the emission should differ between Mn sited on M1 and M2, and the position and shape of the emission peaks may reflect site occupancy factors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%