2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2014.10.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Site occupancy of foraging bats on landscapes of managed pine forest

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
46
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
7
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…, Bender et al. ), Gehrt and Chelsvig () also found that localized habitat features were more important than landscape effects in predicting responses to urbanization. The importance of local versus landscape‐scale habitat characteristics likely varies depending on bat species and region (Walsh and Harris , Johnson et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…, Bender et al. ), Gehrt and Chelsvig () also found that localized habitat features were more important than landscape effects in predicting responses to urbanization. The importance of local versus landscape‐scale habitat characteristics likely varies depending on bat species and region (Walsh and Harris , Johnson et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Insect prey may also aggregate along the edges created by linear disturbances (Jokim€ aki et al 1998, Grindal and Brigham 1999, Deans et al 2005. Although some studies have shown landscape-level change to be significant for bats (Threlfall et al 2012a, Bender et al 2015, Gehrt and Chelsvig (2003) also found that localized habitat features were more important than landscape effects in predicting responses to urbanization. The importance of local versus landscape-scale habitat characteristics likely varies depending on bat species and region (Walsh and Harris 1996, Johnson et al 2008, Chambers et al 2016, Mendes et al 2017).…”
Section: Influence Of Landscape-scale Variables On Bat Activitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using ArcGIS, we generated random points across the landscapes within forests containing suitable roosting habitat (i.e., mature trees). For each roost and random location, we determined forest type and measured distance to nearest fresh water and open area, which we assumed represented foraging habitat (Mager and Nelson 2001, Perry et al 2008, Bender et al 2015). Open areas were absent of canopy species and included salt marsh, shrub habitat, and dunes.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some tree‐roosting bats have low tree fidelity but strong site fidelity, suggesting characteristics at larger scales may be more influential (Elmore et al 2004, Hein et al 2008). Forest cover type and age, amount of forest edge, and forest patch configuration also affect roost site selection and can have important fitness consequences (Crampton and Barclay 1998, Miles et al 2006, Perry et al 2007 b , Snider et al 2013, Bender et al 2015). Many species select roost sites close to fresh water sources, which may reduce commuting costs (Miles et al 2006, Watrous et al 2006, Limpert et al 2007, Perry et al 2008).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation