“…Three main objectives were considered in the analysis: maximization of profitability in microalgal biodiesel production, minimization of direct competition with food production, and minimization of direct impacts on biodiversity (Figure S1). Based on the reviewed literature (Bennett, Turn, & Chan, ; Borowitzka et al, ; Boruff, Moheimani, & Borowitzka, ; Bravo‐Fritz, Sáez‐Navarrete, Herrera, & Ginocchio, ; Chiu & Wu, ; Coleman et al, ; Fortier & Sturm, ; Klise, Roach, & Passell, ; Lundquist et al, ; Mohseni, Pishvaee, & Sahebi, ; Niblick & Landis, ; Orfield et al, ; Prasad, Pullar, & Pratt, ; Quinn, Catton, Johnson, & Bradley, ; Quinn, Catton, Wagner, & Bradley, ; Roostaei & Zhang, ; Sharma et al, ; Venteris, McBride, Coleman, Skaggs, & Wigmosta, ; Venteris, Skaggs, Coleman, & Wigmosta, , ; Venteris et al, ; Venteris, Skaggs, Wigmosta, & Coleman, ; Wigmosta, Coleman, Skaggs, Huesemann, & Lane, ), a set of attributes that capture the complexity of microalgal biodiesel production were selected, either because they are essential for microalgal cultivation or because they have shown to maximize the profitability of microalgal biodiesel production (Sharma et al, ): water availability, lipid productivity, availability of flat lands, proximity to main transport networks (i.e., main roads and railroads), GNI per capita (used as a substitute for the availability of low labor costs), and proximity to known industrial CO 2 sources. Water availability is essential for microalgal cultivation (Chisti, ; Schenk et al, ) while lipid productivity is proportional to biodiesel production, increasing the profitability of microalgal biofuel production (Moody, McGinty, & Quinn, ; Quinn, Winter, & Bradley, ; Slade & Bauen, ).…”