1995
DOI: 10.1109/74.370577
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Site shielding of earth-station antennas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the most simple, but effective ways to reduce the radiating interference is to introduce barriers or fins between the two coupled systems. This solution can be also useful in reducing radiating interference in earth satellite stations [1]. In particular, interference that arises from microwave links operating at the same frequency often arrives from directions close to the horizon; they may sometimes be attenuated by diffraction losses at natural barriers occurring in terrain propagation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One of the most simple, but effective ways to reduce the radiating interference is to introduce barriers or fins between the two coupled systems. This solution can be also useful in reducing radiating interference in earth satellite stations [1]. In particular, interference that arises from microwave links operating at the same frequency often arrives from directions close to the horizon; they may sometimes be attenuated by diffraction losses at natural barriers occurring in terrain propagation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, for oblique incidence, more sophisticated anisotropic BC are needed. The total field at the observation point is described as the sum of the following contributions (1) in which is the incident plus reflected geometrical optics (GO) field, denotes singly diffracted ray-field contributions and doubly diffracted field contributions. Each contribution may or may not exist, depending on both the incidence and observation aspects as can be easily inferred from simple ray tracing.…”
Section: High-frequency Solutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, it is important to distinguish the height of the aperture center above the ground, h e (which is the antenna center height above the ground, in meters), and the total height, h T,R , in meters, which includes the antenna dish. The total height is given by where d ant is the antenna dish diameter, in meters, and θ is the antenna’s elevation angle in degrees [ 20 ]. Finally, it should be pointed out that the lowest value of diffraction loss is yielded when the barrier is approximately in the middle of the path between T and R ( D b = d TR /2), whereas the maximum loss is obtained when it is located close to T or R, respectively [ 19 ].…”
Section: Interference Scenario and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Open construction is generally cheaper and easier to work with, providing less wind resistance than solid shields. An approximate expression for the transmission loss of a square-grid wire mesh (wire diameter much smaller than the wavelength) is given by where g stands for the side length of the square, and λ is the wavelength of the signal [ 20 ]. For example, if a mesh barrier with g = 20 mm is selected, then for λ = 17 mm, L LOS = −7.4 dB, providing an adequate attenuation of the LOS signal.…”
Section: Interference Mitigation Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these works have been limited to linearly polarized antenna systems. Some low-power examples of deep-space radiometry and satellite com munications using circular polarization can be found [19,20]. With practical highpower microwave sources coming closer to realization, it will be important to provide RF devices that can handle high power, and therefore this paper will focus on achieving better power handling in the septum design.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%