2018
DOI: 10.1002/anie.201804020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Site‐Specific Labeling of Affimers for DNA‐PAINT Microscopy

Abstract: Optical super-resolution techniques allow fluorescence imaging below the classical diffraction limit of light. From a technology standpoint, recent methods are approaching molecular-scale spatial resolution. However, this remarkable achievement is not easily translated to imaging of cellular components, since current labeling approaches are limited by either large label sizes (antibodies) or the sparse availability of small and efficient binders (nanobodies, aptamers, genetically-encoded tags). In this work, w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
85
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
85
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…GFP nanobodies were DNA-labeled as previously reported 32 . Nanobodies were concentrated via Amicon 10 kDa spin filters and buffer exchanged into 5 mM TCEP in 1× PBS + 3 mM EDTA at pH 7.5 mM TCEP in 1× PBS + 3 mM EDTA was then added to the GFP Nanobody and was incubated for 2 h at 4 °C on a shaker.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GFP nanobodies were DNA-labeled as previously reported 32 . Nanobodies were concentrated via Amicon 10 kDa spin filters and buffer exchanged into 5 mM TCEP in 1× PBS + 3 mM EDTA at pH 7.5 mM TCEP in 1× PBS + 3 mM EDTA was then added to the GFP Nanobody and was incubated for 2 h at 4 °C on a shaker.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, for application of DNA‐PAINT to a question in cell biology, the docking strands need to be “linked” to the target of interest through DNA‐conjugated affinity reagents . The optimal labeling probe should ideally be smaller than the target protein under investigation, allow for quantitative labeling (1:1 stoichiometry), be available for a large variety of targets, and ultimately be cost‐effective.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different methods have been introduced to conjugate DNA docking strands to protein‐based affinity reagents. Typically, a bifunctional chemical crosslinker harboring a reactive moiety (which can subsequently react with a modified DNA oligonucleotide) was used to react with amino groups or reduced thiols . To produce DNA‐modified secondary labeling reagents, protein A from Staphylococcus aureus and protein G from Streptococcus sp.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The best results for SMLM of actin are obtained using fluorescent phalloidin, because it allows for a very high density of labeling and results in crisp reconstruction of filamentous actin (K. Xu et al, 2012). As an alternative, PAINT of actin has been performed using phalloidin coupled to a DNA docking strand or actin-targeting affimers (Schlichthaerle et al, 2018a). It is also possible to use fluorescent LifeAct that transiently binds to actin in fixed samples to generate an SMLM image, a technique called Integrating exchangeable single-molecule localization (IRIS) (Ashdown et al, 2017;Kiuchi et al, 2015;Tas et al, 2018).…”
Section: Actin Stainingmentioning
confidence: 99%