2018
DOI: 10.1039/c8cc04520h
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Site-specific one-pot triple click labeling for DNA and RNA

Abstract: We report site-specific triple click labeling for DNA and RNA in a one-pot setup by performing inverse electron demand Diels–Alder reaction and strain-promoted and copper catalyzed click reactions sequentially.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This triple labeling can be used to study the dynamics of nucleic acid structures during folding and the population of multiple folding states using FRET. 102…”
Section: Two-step Chemical Labeling Via Solid-phase Synthesismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This triple labeling can be used to study the dynamics of nucleic acid structures during folding and the population of multiple folding states using FRET. 102…”
Section: Two-step Chemical Labeling Via Solid-phase Synthesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With this approach, it was possible to triple label, for instance, the preQ1 riboswitch RNA, rendering this strategy applicable for folding and dynamic studies. 102 For RNA labeling, the polymerase-based approaches are, in principle, similar to the DNA-labeling approaches, but based on in vitro transcription with a DNA-dependent RNA polymerase, such as T7. In 2014, a cytidine triphosphate analog bearing a trans-cyclooctene at the 5-position (CTP tco ) was synthesized and incorporated into RNA by T7 RNA polymerase (Fig.…”
Section: Direct Chemo-enzymatic Labelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, dual modifications at 2′‐ and 4′‐ sugar positions such as 4′‐ C ‐aminomethyl‐2′‐ O ‐methyl (4′‐AM‐2′‐OMe), 4′‐ C ‐aminoethyl‐2′‐ O ‐methyl (4′‐AMEt‐2′‐OMe), and 4′‐ C ‐aminopropyl‐2′‐ O ‐methyl (4′‐AMPr‐2′‐OMe) analogs have adopted C2′‐ endo (South , DNA ‐type) sugar conformation [21,22] . In contrast, other bi‐functional sugar modifications such as 4′‐ C ‐aminomethyl‐2′‐deoxy‐2′‐fluoro (4′‐AM‐2′‐F), 4′‐ C ‐aminoethyl‐2′‐deoxy‐2′‐fluoro (4′‐AMEt‐2′‐F), 2′,4′‐diF, 2′‐OMe‐4′‐F, 2′‐F‐4′‐OMe, 2′,4′‐diOMe, 2′‐F‐4′‐OMe‐araU, 2′,4′‐diF‐araU tuned the sugar conformation predominantly toward C3′‐ endo ( North , RNA ‐type), which has been attributed to the small size, high electronegativity of fluorine, and additional C−H⋅⋅⋅F interactions [23–30] . From the above observations, it is clear that 2′ and 4′‐ modifications can alter the sugar conformation, structural stability, and functional role of the duplex.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this purpose orthogonal reactions are required. Although several examples of multiple labeling of nucleic acids have been described in the literature (Meyer et al., 2010; Reisacher et al., 2019; Schoch, Staudt, Samanta, Wiessler, & Jäschke, 2012; Winz, Linder, Becker, & Jäschke, 2018), new orthogonal click reactions are needed to expand the potential of multiple labeling strategies. The sulfo‐click reaction is an emergent alternative click reaction which involves a thioacid and a sulfonyl azide.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%