DNA Repair and Recombination 1995
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-011-0537-8_5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Site-specific recombination and circular chromosome segregation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
45
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite this symmetry, the related XerC and XerD site-speci®c recombinases faithfully recognize the two different halves of these elements . An alignment of some of the better characterized core regions recognized by the Xer recombinases indicates that whereas XerD binding sites are well conserved, XerC binding sites are more variable (Figure 1; Sherratt et al, 1993). In the case of dif, the XerC and XerD binding sites are palindromic at six of 11 positions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Despite this symmetry, the related XerC and XerD site-speci®c recombinases faithfully recognize the two different halves of these elements . An alignment of some of the better characterized core regions recognized by the Xer recombinases indicates that whereas XerD binding sites are well conserved, XerC binding sites are more variable (Figure 1; Sherratt et al, 1993). In the case of dif, the XerC and XerD binding sites are palindromic at six of 11 positions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The sequences of the cer-like sites of ColE2-CA42, ColE2-GEI602, ColE2imm-K317, ColE4-CT9, ColE5-099, ColE6-CT14, ColE7-K317, ColE8-J and ColE9-J were described by Hiraga et al (1994). The sequences of other sites are derived from Sherratt et al (1993). bases in the XerD binding site (positions 13, 11 and 10, respectively) among the recombination sites shown in Figure 1 suggesting that these nucleotides may be of particular signi®cance in determining binding speci®city. The relative contributions of these ®ve positions to XerC and XerD binding speci®city was probed using a set of mutated dif sites in which the XerC binding site was made progressively more palindromic with the XerD binding site (see Figure 5A).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Using a synthetic Holliday junction containing the cer6 site, XerC has been shown to cleave the phosphodiester between the last base of the XerC binding site and the first base of the central region on the top strand (Arciszewska & Sherratt, 1995). To determine directly the cleavage positions for both recombinases at dif, we used top and bottom linear suicide substrates that were labelled at the 3'-end of the central region nick; subsequent reaction with XerC and XerD should release a short oligonucleotide containing the 32 P label, the size of which depends on the cleavage position.…”
Section: Recombinase Cleavage Positions Are Separated By 6 Bpmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…XerC has also been shown to mediate top strand exchange on cer6 synthetic Holliday junctions, but no bottom strand cleavage or exchange was detected on this substrate. XerC strand exchange occurs at the position of XerC-mediated cleavage (Arciszewska & Sherratt, 1995;Arciszewska et al, 1995).…”
Section: In Vitro Cleavage Of Dif Suicide Substratesmentioning
confidence: 99%