2003
DOI: 10.1007/s00299-003-0616-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Site-specific recombination for genetic engineering in plants

Abstract: Site-specific recombination has been developed into a genetic engineering tool for higher eukaryotes. The manipulation of newly introduced DNA is now possible in the course of genetic transformation procedures, thus making the process more predictable and reliable. Also, a wide variety of chromosomal rearrangements using site-specific recombination have been documented both in metazoan and plant species. Applying such methods to plants opens new avenues for large-scale chromosome engineering in the future.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
(69 reference statements)
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, they have been successfully employed for the removal of selectable markers from transgenic plants (Hoa et al, 2002;Zhang et al, 2003;Srivastava and Ow, 2004;Sreekala et al, 2005;Wang et al, 2005;Jia et al, 2006;Moore and Srivastava, 2006), and, second, they can be used to precisely integrate single-copy transgenes into the plant genome (Albert et al, 1995;Day et al, 2000;Srivastava and Ow, 2002;Lyznik et al, 2003;Chawla et al, 2006). This latter approach requires two rounds of transformation: in the first, a target site, such as the loxP site, is randomly introduced into the plant genome, and, in the second, a loxP-containing DNA construct is integrated into this genomic target site.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, they have been successfully employed for the removal of selectable markers from transgenic plants (Hoa et al, 2002;Zhang et al, 2003;Srivastava and Ow, 2004;Sreekala et al, 2005;Wang et al, 2005;Jia et al, 2006;Moore and Srivastava, 2006), and, second, they can be used to precisely integrate single-copy transgenes into the plant genome (Albert et al, 1995;Day et al, 2000;Srivastava and Ow, 2002;Lyznik et al, 2003;Chawla et al, 2006). This latter approach requires two rounds of transformation: in the first, a target site, such as the loxP site, is randomly introduced into the plant genome, and, in the second, a loxP-containing DNA construct is integrated into this genomic target site.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Insertion of the cloned DNA into the chromosome can avoid these problems; however, current methods of cloned DNA insertion for use with Methanosarcina are less efficient by a factor of about 100 than transformation with autonomous plasmids because of their dependence on homologous recombination. In other organisms, methods utilizing site-specific recombination, instead of homologous recombination, have allowed much higher integration efficiencies (e.g., Lyznik et al 2003, Schweizer 2003, and references therein). One particularly useful site-specific recombinase system utilizes the Streptomyces bacteriophage φC31 integrase (Thorpe and Smith 1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many other effective recombination systems are well established in the GT of mouse and random transformation in higher plants in addition to Cre-loxP, such as R-RS, FLP-FRT, and fC31-att (Odell and Russell 1994b;Ebinuma et al 2001;Hare and Chua 2001;Ow 2002;Lyznik et al 2003). Simultaneously, it has been realized that our strong positive-negative selection-mediated GT in rice is quite effective and widely applicable to any gene region without any other random integration (Terada et al 2002;Iida and Terada 2004; on the basis of acumulative information of the whole genome sequence (IRGSP 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such undesirable recombination events were reported in the gene-specific selection procedures described above (Hanin et al 2001;Endo et al 2007). Therefore, the combined use of site-specific recombination with our strong positive-negative selection is expected to create various gene modifications at the targeted gene locus as in mouse conditional GT (Brian 1998;Gu et al 1994;Lyznik et al 2003).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%