1981
DOI: 10.1093/forestry/54.1.41
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sitka Spruce (Picea sitchensis) in North-East Scotland I. Relationships between Site Factors and Growth

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A similar effect was observed for radiata pine trees growing in Tasmania (Cown et al 2006). Elevation has also been found to be most important factor affecting the productivity of Sitka spruce plantations growing in northern Britain (Malcolm and Studholme 1972, Blyth and MacLeod 1981, Worrell and Malcolm 1990a, 1990b. This is because elevation is highly correlated with a number of climatic factors such as growing season temperature (accumulated temperature), rainfall and windiness which are known to affect tree growth (Grace 1977, Cannell andSmith 1983).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A similar effect was observed for radiata pine trees growing in Tasmania (Cown et al 2006). Elevation has also been found to be most important factor affecting the productivity of Sitka spruce plantations growing in northern Britain (Malcolm and Studholme 1972, Blyth and MacLeod 1981, Worrell and Malcolm 1990a, 1990b. This is because elevation is highly correlated with a number of climatic factors such as growing season temperature (accumulated temperature), rainfall and windiness which are known to affect tree growth (Grace 1977, Cannell andSmith 1983).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the same time, forest productivity is generally regulated by a variety of soil factors, such as soil chemical and physical properties (Mashimo 1960;Fourt et al 1971;Jokela et al 1988;Tange 1995;Corona et al 1998) and soil moisture regime (Negisi 1966;Shrivastava 1982;Iverson et al 1997). Some studies have demonstrated that soil C and N contents are important soil variables in explaining forest productivity (Blyth and MacLeod 1981;Jokela et al 1988;Zutter et al 1997). Although close relationships exist between these factors, patterns of spatial variation in soil C and N storage and the influence of forest productivity on these patterns have not been sufficiently investigated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, in southeast Alaska, soil physical properties such as soil depth, soil drainage, coarse fragment and organic carbon content were important factors related to Sitka spruce site index (Stephens et al, 1968;Ford et al, 1998). On the other hand, in Great Britain, soil moisture content, soil colour, depth of raw humus, drainage status, and total N and P contents of the organic layer were important variables related to the yield class of Sitka spruce (Page, 1970;Blyth and MacLeod, 1981). Climatic variables also show significant relationships with the productivity of the species.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Blyth and MacLeod, 1981;Worrell and Malcolm, 1990;MacMillan, 1991;Hassall et al, 1994). The identification of which site quality variables are useful indicators of Sitka spruce productivity differs between studies, because the range of site quality variables examined varies widely between studies, studies are restricted to a narrow range of environmental factors where growth is strongly correlated with one or two variables, whose variability over the study area is low.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%